For Springhill Suites By Marriott, which states have amendments to the disclosure document included in the exhibit?
Springhill_Suites_By_Marriott Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
](_page_272_Picture_0.jpeg)
EXHIBIT C FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT D
STATE AMENDMENTS TO DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
STATE AMENDMENTS TO DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
This exhibit contains amendments to the disclosure document for the following states:
| California | |--------------| | Hawaii | | Illinois | | Maryland | | Minnesota | | New York | | North Dakota | | Rhode Island | | Virginia | | Washington | | |
CALIFORNIA
STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICABLE TO THE FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
- THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW REQUIRES THAT A COPY OF ALL PROPOSED AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF THE FRANCHISE BE DELIVERED TOGETHER WITH THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
- Item 3 of the disclosure document is modified to include the following:
Neither we, nor any person identified in Item 2, is subject to any currently effective order of any national securities association or national securities exchange (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.
Source: Item 11 — FINANCING OF THE HOTEL (FDD pages 265–285)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Springhill Suites By Marriott Franchise Disclosure Document, Exhibit D includes state-specific amendments to the disclosure document for Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, and Hawaii. These amendments address statutory and regulatory provisions applicable to franchisees in those states.
For a prospective Springhill Suites By Marriott franchisee, this means that the standard franchise agreement is modified by the laws of their state if they are franchising in one of the listed states. The amendments cover various aspects, including but not limited to choice of forum, choice of law, and franchisee rights upon termination, ensuring compliance with local franchise laws.
For example, Illinois has specific stipulations regarding choice of forum and law, voiding requirements for litigation outside Illinois for claims under the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act. Similarly, North Dakota prohibits certain restrictions on franchisees, such as requiring consent to out-of-state jurisdiction or waiving trial by jury. Maryland and New York have amendments to specific items within the franchise agreement, adding further protections and clarifications for franchisees in those states.
It is important for potential Springhill Suites By Marriott franchisees to carefully review Exhibit D and understand the specific amendments applicable to their state to ensure they are aware of their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement, as modified by local laws. These state-specific amendments can significantly impact the franchise relationship and should be considered as part of the due diligence process.