In Minnesota, is a Springhill Suites By Marriott franchisee required to assent to a general release?
Springhill_Suites_By_Marriott Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- Minnesota Rules 2860.4400(D) prohibits a franchisor from requiring a franchisee to assent to a general release.
Source: Item 17 — , "Renewal, Termination, Transfer, and Dispute Resolution," is amended by the addition of the following paragraph(s) at the conclusion of the Item: (FDD pages 285–553)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Springhill Suites By Marriott Franchise Disclosure Document, Minnesota Rules prohibit Springhill Suites By Marriott from requiring a franchisee to agree to a general release. This means that Springhill Suites By Marriott cannot force franchisees in Minnesota to sign away their rights to future claims or legal actions against the company as a condition of the franchise agreement.
This protection is specific to Minnesota, as franchise laws vary by state. The FDD includes several state-specific amendments to ensure compliance with local regulations. This particular rule is designed to protect franchisees from potentially overreaching demands by the franchisor.
For a prospective Springhill Suites By Marriott franchisee in Minnesota, this is a beneficial provision. It ensures that they retain the ability to pursue legal remedies if issues arise during the franchise term, without having been forced to waive those rights upfront. Franchisees should consult with a legal professional to fully understand their rights and obligations under Minnesota franchise law.