factual

In which court is the Moehrl case against Remax pending?

Remax Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

  1. Christopher Moehrl, Michael Cole, Steve Darnell, Jack Ramey, Daniel Umpa, and Jane Ruh v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc. RE/MAX, LLC., and Keller Williams Realty, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-01610, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, filed on March 6, 2019.

Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 21–29)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Remax's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Moehrl case, officially titled Christopher Moehrl, Michael Cole, Steve Darnell, Jack Ramey, Daniel Umpa, and Jane Ruh v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc. RE/MAX, LLC., and Keller Williams Realty, Inc., is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case, identified as Case No. 19-cv-01610, was initially filed on March 6, 2019.

This information is crucial for prospective Remax franchisees as it highlights ongoing legal challenges that Remax is currently involved in. The nature of the Moehrl case, being an antitrust litigation, suggests potential implications for Remax's business practices and financial obligations. Antitrust cases can lead to significant settlements or judgments, which may affect the financial stability of the company and, by extension, its franchisees.

Furthermore, the FDD mentions that Remax has entered into a Settlement Term Sheet to resolve the Burnett Action and Moehrl Action, agreeing to certain changes in its business practices and a settlement amount of $55 million. While this settlement aims to resolve claims, it also indicates the scale of the legal challenges Remax faces. A prospective franchisee should consider the potential impact of these legal issues on the franchise system, including any changes in operational procedures or financial contributions that may arise from the settlement or ongoing litigation. It is important to note that Remax continues to deny the allegations in these cases, but has chosen to settle to avoid further costs of litigation.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.