For a Floyds 99 franchise in Washington, can court decisions supersede the franchise agreement regarding termination?
Floyds_99 Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 58–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Floyds 99 Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchises in Washington state, court decisions may indeed supersede the franchise agreement, especially concerning termination and renewal. This means that if a court makes a ruling that conflicts with the terms outlined in the franchise agreement regarding how or when the franchise can be terminated or renewed, the court's decision will take precedence.
This protection is further reinforced by the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, which, according to the FDD, may also supersede the franchise agreement in areas of termination and renewal. This Act aims to protect franchisees from unfair practices by franchisors, ensuring that franchisees are not bound by contractual terms that are deemed unjust or violate the Act.
For a prospective Floyds 99 franchisee in Washington, this is a crucial safeguard. It ensures that the franchise agreement is not the final word on all matters, particularly those as critical as termination and renewal. Franchisees should be aware of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act and any relevant court decisions that could impact their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement. Consulting with an attorney experienced in franchise law in Washington is advisable to fully understand these protections and how they apply to their specific situation.