Is a Floyds 99 developer prohibited from owning securities in a Competitive Business if those securities are publicly traded and represent 5% or less of the outstanding shares?
Floyds_99 Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
The term "Competitive Business" as used in this Agreement shall mean any business operating or granting franchises or licenses to others to operate, either (i) a retail hair care business deriving more than 5% of its gross sales from the sale of haircuts or hair care products; or (ii) a wholesale business deriving more than 5% of its gross sales from the sale of hair care products. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer shall not be prohibited from owning securities in a Competitive Business if such securities are listed on a stock exchange or traded on the over-the-counter market and represent 5% or less of that class of securities issued and outstanding.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 58–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Floyds 99 Franchise Disclosure Document, a developer is not prohibited from owning securities in a Competitive Business under certain conditions. A "Competitive Business" is defined as any business operating or franchising a retail hair care business deriving more than 5% of its gross sales from haircuts or hair care products, or a wholesale business deriving more than 5% of its gross sales from hair care products.
However, this restriction does not apply if the securities are listed on a stock exchange or traded over-the-counter, and if they represent 5% or less of the outstanding shares of that class of securities. This exception allows a Floyds 99 developer to make minor investments in publicly traded competitor companies without violating the non-competition agreement.
This provision balances the franchisor's need to protect its business interests with the franchisee's ability to make independent investment decisions. It is a fairly standard clause in franchise agreements, allowing franchisees some flexibility in their investment portfolios while preventing them from having a significant controlling interest in competing businesses.