On what date was the lawsuit against Floyds 99 Franchising, LLC dismissed?
Floyds_99 Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
lution/Columbia Care) in Denver, Colorado.
ITEM 3. LITIGATION
Matthew Chavez and Nicole Deis v. Roise Barbers, Inc., Jonathan M. Roise, Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC and Floyd's 99 Franchising, LLC, No. 37-2020-00040793-CU-OE-CTL (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego, filed November 6, 2020). On March 27, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint to add Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC and Floyd's 99 Franchising, LLC as defendants to the lawsuit previously filed against Roise Barbers, Inc., a FLOYD'S 99 franchisee,
and Jonathan Roise. Plaintiffs are former employees of Roise Barbers, Inc., and sought damages, relief and restitution under California law for alleged employment and labor violations. Plaintiffs alleged that Floyd's 99 Franchising, LLC was liable as a joint employer or co-employer with Roise Barbers, Inc. On June 14, 2023, Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC was removed from the litigation when it was dismissed without prejudice. On September 6, 2024, Floyd's 99 Franchising, LLC paid $2,500 as part of a larger settlement with Defendants in order to avoid additional attorneys' fees and all parties entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement. On Dec
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 13–14)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Floyds 99 Franchise Disclosure Document, a lawsuit involving Floyds 99 Franchising, LLC was dismissed on December 12, 2024. The original lawsuit, filed on November 6, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego, initially targeted Roise Barbers, Inc., a Floyds 99 franchisee, and Jonathan Roise.
Floyds 99 Franchising, LLC was added as a defendant on March 27, 2023, when the Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint. The plaintiffs, former employees of Roise Barbers, Inc., sought damages for alleged employment and labor violations, claiming that Floyds 99 Franchising, LLC was liable as a joint employer or co-employer.
To avoid additional legal costs, Floyds 99 Franchising, LLC paid $2,500 as part of a larger settlement with the Defendants on September 6, 2024, and all parties signed a Settlement and Release Agreement. The court then dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice on December 12, 2024. This means the case was dismissed but could potentially be brought again in the future.