What does the term 'good cause' mean in the context of Eos Worldwide terminating a franchise?
Eos_Worldwide Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
THE STATE OF WISCONSIN**
The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law Title XIV-A Ch. 135, Sec. 135.01-135.07 shall supersede any conflicting terms of the Franchise Agreement for EOS Worldwide Franchising, LLC.
In all other respects, the Franchise Agreement will be construed and enforced with its terms.
FOR THE TERRITORY OF PUERTO RICO
In recognition of the requirements of the Puerto Rico Dealers Act known as Law 75, the Franchise Agreement for EOS Worldwide Franchising, LLC is amended as follows:
-
- Termination and Non-Renewal. Law 75 makes it unlawful for a franchisor to cancel or not renew a franchise without just cause. If any grounds for default, termination or non- renewal stated in the Franchise Agreement does not constitute "just cause," as that term may be defined by Law 75 or the laws of Puerto Rico, that provision may not be enforceable.
-
- Jurisdiction and Venue. The Franchise Agreement is amended to state that restricting jurisdiction or venue to a forum outside the territory of Puerto Rico or requiring the application of the laws of another state is void with respect to a claim otherwise enforceable under Law 75.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 74)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 FDD, the definition of 'good cause' for termination of an Eos Worldwide franchise agreement is not explicitly defined within the document, but it is addressed in the context of specific state laws. For franchisees in Puerto Rico, Law 75 (the Puerto Rico Dealers Act) makes it unlawful for a franchisor to cancel or not renew a franchise without 'just cause'. The FDD states that if any grounds for default, termination, or non-renewal stated in the Franchise Agreement do not constitute 'just cause' as defined by Law 75 or the laws of Puerto Rico, that provision may not be enforceable. Similarly, for franchisees in Virginia, the Virginia Retail Franchising Act makes it unlawful for a franchisor to cancel a franchise without 'reasonable cause,' and any termination grounds not meeting this definition may be unenforceable.
This means that the specific actions that would allow Eos Worldwide to terminate a franchise for 'good cause' are determined by the relevant laws in Puerto Rico and Virginia. These laws may provide a specific definition, or it may be determined by court precedent. The FDD indicates that the standard Franchise Agreement might contain provisions that do not meet the legal threshold for 'just cause' or 'reasonable cause' in those jurisdictions, and those provisions would not be enforceable.
For a prospective Eos Worldwide franchisee, this highlights the importance of understanding the specific franchise laws in their state or territory. If you are considering a franchise in Puerto Rico or Virginia, you should consult with an attorney to understand what constitutes 'just cause' or 'reasonable cause' for termination under local law. You should also carefully review the Franchise Agreement to identify any provisions that might conflict with these legal protections. While the FDD does not provide a universal definition of 'good cause,' it acknowledges that state laws will take precedence over the standard terms of the Franchise Agreement in certain circumstances.