factual

Which state's law does Section 48 of the Dryject Franchise Agreement require to be applied?

Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

arks, service
marks, trade names, logotypes or other commercial symbols or indemnify
Franchise Owner from any loss, costs or expenses arising out of any claim,
suit or demand regarding the use of the name.”
7. Waiver of Rights and Injunctive Relief. Under Minn. Rule 2860.4400J,
the Agreement is amended to include that it shall be unfair and inequitable
for any person to require a franchisee to waive his or her rights to a jury trial
or waive rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided by the laws
of the jurisdiction, or to consent to liquidated damages, termination
procedures, or judgment notes; provided that the foregoing shall not bar an
exclusive arbitration clause. Under Minn. Rule 2860.4400J, a franchisee
cannot waive any rights or consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive
relief (although the franchisor may seek injunctive relief). Each reference in
the Agreement to the phrase “Franchise Owner consents that DryJect is
entitled to injunctive relief” or words of similar import shall be deleted and
the phrase “DryJect may seek injunctive relief” shall be inserted in its place.
8. Jurisdiction. The following is added to Section 48:
Minn. Stat. Sec. 80C.,21 and Minn. Rules 2860.4400J prohibit DryJect from
requiring litigation to be conducted outside Minnesota, requiring waiver of
a jury trial, or requiring the franchisee to consent to liquidated damages,
termination penalties or judgment notes. In addition, nothing in the
disclosure document or franchise agreement can abrogate or reduce any of
Franchise Owner’s rights as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
80C, or Franchise Owner’s rights to any procedure, forum or remedies
provided for by the laws of the jurisdiction.

Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Section 48 of the franchise agreement is modified for franchisees in Minnesota. Specifically, Minnesota Statutes Section 80C.21 and Minnesota Rules 2860.4400J are added to Section 48. These additions prevent Dryject from requiring litigation to occur outside of Minnesota, mandating a waiver of jury trial, or requiring the franchisee to consent to liquidated damages, termination penalties, or judgment notes.

Furthermore, the added stipulations ensure that nothing in the disclosure document or franchise agreement can diminish a franchisee's rights as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80C, or their rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies available under Minnesota law. This modification is intended to protect the rights of Dryject franchisees operating in Minnesota.

For prospective Dryject franchisees, this means that if they operate in Minnesota, certain provisions of the standard franchise agreement that might conflict with Minnesota law will not apply. This ensures that Minnesota franchisees retain all the protections and rights afforded to them under Minnesota state law, particularly concerning legal proceedings and dispute resolution.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.