Which state's law governs the construction and interpretation of the Dryject franchise agreement in arbitration?

According to the 2025 Dryject Franchise Disclosure Document, the law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania governs the construction and interpretation of the Dryject franchise agreement during arbitration. This means that in any arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator will primarily rely on Pennsylvania law when interpreting the terms and conditions outlined in the franchise agreement.

This clause is important for prospective Dryject franchisees as it establishes the legal framework that will be used to resolve disputes through arbitration. Even if a franchisee operates their Dryject business in a different state, Pennsylvania law will still apply to the interpretation of the agreement. This could have implications for how certain provisions of the agreement are understood and enforced.

It is fairly common in franchising for the franchise agreement to specify a particular state's law to govern the agreement, often the state where the franchisor's principal place of business is located. Franchisees should be aware of the specific laws of that state and how they might affect their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement. Franchisees may want to seek legal counsel to understand the implications of the governing law provision.