What rules of procedure and evidence should the arbitrator apply during arbitration of a Dryject franchise dispute?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
cifically including the Optional Rules). If such Rules are in any way contrary to or in conflict with this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control. The Arbitrator shall apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence to the extent possible while, in Arbitrator's discretion, still effecting the arbitration goal of streamlined administrative proce
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dryject Franchise Disclosure Document, the arbitrator is required to apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence during the arbitration process, as much as possible. However, the arbitrator has the discretion to streamline the administrative procedure to meet the goals of arbitration.
In cases where the AAA (American Arbitration Association) Rules conflict with the Dryject franchise agreement, the terms of the agreement will take precedence. This ensures that the specific terms negotiated within the franchise agreement are upheld during dispute resolution.
This means a prospective Dryject franchisee can expect a formal legal framework for arbitration, but with some flexibility for efficiency. Franchisees should become familiar with both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence to understand their rights and obligations during arbitration. Franchisees should also pay close attention to the specific terms of the franchise agreement, as those terms will govern if there are any conflicts with the AAA rules.