What rules of evidence apply during Dryject arbitration?

According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the arbitrator is expected to apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence during arbitration to the extent possible. However, the arbitrator has the discretion to modify these rules to ensure the arbitration remains a streamlined administrative procedure. This means that while the formal rules of evidence and procedure used in federal court should generally apply, the arbitrator can adjust them to keep the arbitration efficient.

This flexibility is intended to balance fairness with the need for a quicker and less expensive resolution process compared to traditional litigation. Franchisees should be aware that the arbitrator's interpretation and application of these rules can significantly impact the outcome of the arbitration. The agreement also specifies that the law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania governs the construction and interpretation of the agreement in arbitration.

For a prospective Dryject franchisee, this means understanding that while you have some protection under established federal rules, the arbitrator has considerable leeway. It would be prudent to consult with an attorney experienced in franchise law and arbitration to fully understand your rights and obligations in this process. This is especially important given that the arbitrator must have at least ten years of experience practicing law and possess specific knowledge of franchise law.