Is Dryject required to post a bond to obtain injunctive relief against a Dryject franchisee?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- (b) You agree that We will not be required to post a bond to obtain any injunctive relief and that Your only remedy if an injunction is entered against You will be to seek the dissolution of that injunction, if warranted, upon due hearing (all claims for damages by reason of the wrongful issuance of such injunction being expressly waived hereby).
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dryject Franchise Disclosure Document, Dryject is not required to post a bond to obtain injunctive relief against a franchisee. The agreement states that the franchisee agrees that Dryject will not be required to post a bond to obtain any injunctive relief.
Furthermore, the document specifies that if an injunction is entered against the franchisee, the franchisee's only recourse is to seek the dissolution of that injunction if warranted after a due hearing. The franchisee expressly waives any claims for damages resulting from the wrongful issuance of such an injunction.
This clause is significant because it potentially limits the franchisee's legal options and financial protection in the event of an injunction. Typically, a bond is required to protect the enjoined party from losses if the injunction is later found to be wrongfully issued. By waiving the bond requirement and claims for damages, the franchisee assumes a greater risk.