If litigation is not precluded, where can a Dryject franchisee bring an action related to the sale of franchises or violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, if the franchise agreement does not preclude litigation, a franchisee may file a lawsuit in Washington state concerning the sale of franchises or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. This stipulation applies specifically to franchises purchased in Washington.
This means that Dryject franchisees who believe they have a claim related to franchise sales practices or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act have the option to pursue legal action within the state of Washington, assuming the franchise agreement doesn't prohibit it. This is particularly relevant for franchisees operating in Washington, as it ensures they have a local venue for resolving disputes covered by the Act.
It is important for prospective Dryject franchisees to understand the implications of this clause, especially if they are located in Washington. They should carefully review the franchise agreement to determine whether litigation is precluded and consult with legal counsel to understand their rights and options under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act.