factual

What happens if there is a conflict between the Dryject franchise agreement and the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act?

Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

e Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement, and all related agreements regardless of anything to the contrary contained therein. This Addendum applies if: (a) the offer to sell a franchise is accepted in Washington; (b) the purchaser of the franchise is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) the franchised business that is the subject of the sale is to be located or operated, wholly or partly, in Washington.

    1. Conflict of Laws. In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
    1. Franchisee Bill of Rights. RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor. Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.
    1. Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation. In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
    1. General Release. A release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement or related agreements purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rules or orders thereunder is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2). In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).
    1. Statute of Limitations and Waiver of Jury Trial. Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington
  • Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.

    1. Transfer Fees. Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
    1. Termination by Franchisee. The franchisee may terminate the franchise agreement under any grounds permitted under state law.
    1. Certain Buy-Back Provisions. Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee's business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee's consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause.

Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, if there is a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, will take precedence. This means that any part of the Dryject franchise agreement that contradicts the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act will be superseded by the Act.

Additionally, RCW 19.100.180, also known as the Franchisee Bill of Rights, may override specific provisions in the franchise agreement or related documents concerning the franchisee's relationship with Dryject, particularly in areas like termination and renewal. Court decisions may also supersede the franchise agreement. Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.

Furthermore, any release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement that requires the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is void. The only exception is when the release is executed as part of a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect, and both parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2). This also applies to releases or waivers executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise, with the same exception as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).

Finally, provisions in the franchise agreement that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act, such as the right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable. Also, no statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed by a franchisee can waive claims under state franchise law or disclaim reliance on statements made by Dryject or its representatives. Any provision prohibiting communication with regulators is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(h).

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.