What happens if a state law prohibits a Dryject franchisee from executing a general release?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- (f) You, except to the extent prohibited by state law, execute a general release, in a form prescribed by Us, of any and all claims You may have against Us and Our subsidiaries and affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, members, managers, agents and employees;
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 50–68)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee is typically required to execute a general release of claims against Dryject and its affiliates as part of the franchise renewal process. However, this requirement is conditional. If a state law prohibits a Dryject franchisee from executing such a release, the franchisee is not required to do so.
This provision protects franchisees in states where such releases are legally restricted or unenforceable. It ensures that franchisees are not forced to waive their legal rights in order to renew their franchise agreement. This flexibility acknowledges the varying legal landscapes across different states and aims to comply with local regulations.
For a prospective Dryject franchisee, this means that the requirement to sign a general release is not absolute. If the franchisee's state has laws that prevent them from executing such a release, they will not be required to do so as a condition of franchise renewal. It is important for potential franchisees to understand the laws in their specific state regarding general releases and waivers of claims.