For Dryject franchises, which fee, initial or royalty, is related to the trademark and intellectual property?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
ADDENDUM TO DRYJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF NEW YORK
The franchisor has represented the following:
-
- That no portion of the initial franchise fee has been allocated to the trademark or intellectual property; and
-
- That the initial franchise fee consists only of payments for initial training, advertising, manuals, uniforms and legal costs, which are distinct from and not brand or trademark related to the franchisor; and
-
- That only the royalty fee is related to the trademark and intellectual property.
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dryject Franchise Disclosure Document, in the state of New York, the royalty fee is related to the trademark and intellectual property. The FDD stipulates that no portion of the initial franchise fee is allocated to the trademark or intellectual property.
Instead, the initial franchise fee for Dryject covers costs associated with initial training, advertising, manuals, uniforms, and legal expenses. These elements are considered distinct from the brand or trademark itself.
This distinction is important for prospective Dryject franchisees in New York as it clarifies how their payments are allocated. It also suggests that the ongoing royalty fees are directly tied to the continued use and benefit of the Dryject brand's intellectual property.