In the event of conflicting provisions between the Dryject Franchise Agreement and this Rider, which document takes precedence?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
parately pay for the charges I (we) owe under my (our) Franchise Agreement with DryJect Management, LLC.
| AMENDMENT TO DRYJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC | |
|---|---|
| FRANCHISE AGREEMENT | |
| REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA | |
| THIS RIDER (the “Rider”) is effective as of _______________________, 20 (the | |
| “Agreement Date”), and amends the Franchise Agreement dated ________, 20 | |
| (the “Agreement”), between DRYJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC (hereinafter referred to as | |
| “DryJect” or “Company”), with its principal office at 307 Lincoln Ave., Hatboro, PA | |
| 19040 and _______________ (“Franchise Owner”), whose mailing address is | |
| _______________. | 1. Precedence and Defined Terms. This Rider is an integral part of, and is incorporated into, the Agreement. Nevertheless, this Rider supersedes any inconsistent or conflicting provisions of the Agreement. |
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Dryject's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, specifically the amendment to the franchise agreement required by the state of Minnesota, the Rider takes precedence over the Franchise Agreement in case of conflicting provisions. The Rider is considered an integral part of the agreement, but it is designed to supersede any inconsistent or conflicting elements that may exist within the original agreement. This ensures that the terms of the Rider are upheld and followed. Terms not specifically defined in the Rider will have the same meanings as defined in the original Franchise Agreement.
This clause is important for prospective Dryject franchisees in Minnesota as it clarifies which document's terms will be enforced if discrepancies arise. Franchisees should pay close attention to the Rider and understand how it modifies the original Franchise Agreement to ensure compliance and avoid potential disputes. This also means that the franchisee should carefully review both the Rider and the Franchise Agreement to understand the full scope of their rights and obligations.
It is also important to note that Dryject reserves the right to challenge the enforceability of any state law that declares void or unenforceable any provision contained in the Agreement. This would be done by bringing legal action or raising the claim in a legal action initiated by the Franchise Owner.