What constitutes 'moral turpitude' in the context of a crime that could affect a Dryject franchisee's agreement?
Dryject Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- (x) Are indicted or arrested, charged, publicly accused in the national or regional media or convicted of any felony whatsoever, or if You are convicted of any crime involving fraud, deception or moral turpitude, or commit any crime or offense reasonably likely, in Our sole opinion, to materially and unfavorably affect the Licensed Rights, the marks and associated goodwill and reputation of Us, Our System, Our affiliates and/or Our other franchisees;
Source: Item 8 — BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP (FDD pages 68–229)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dryject FDD, if a franchisee is convicted of any crime involving fraud, deception, or moral turpitude, it could materially and unfavorably affect the licensed rights, marks, goodwill, and reputation of Dryject, its system, affiliates, and other franchisees. The FDD does not define "moral turpitude," but it generally refers to conduct that is considered base, vile, or depraved and violates accepted moral standards.
This clause in the franchise agreement allows Dryject to take action if a franchisee's criminal behavior reflects poorly on the brand. This could include termination of the franchise agreement, depending on the severity and impact of the crime.
Prospective Dryject franchisees should be aware that any conviction of a felony or a crime involving fraud, deception, or moral turpitude could have serious consequences for their franchise agreement. It is advisable to seek legal counsel to understand the full implications of this clause and what types of actions might be considered as crimes involving moral turpitude in their jurisdiction.