What remedy does Dollar Rent A Car have for violations of the confidentiality agreement?
Dollar_Rent_A_Car Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-
- Recipient acknowledges that any violation of this Agreement by Recipient will cause irreparable harm for which no adequate remedy at law may be available. Accordingly, Recipient consents to the issuance of an injunction to prevent or to halt any such violation. Recipient also agrees the Franchisor and Franchisee may each avail themselves of any other rights and remedies which they may have under this Agreement or otherwise. Further, any claim that Recipient may have against Franchisor or Franchisee, whether or not arising from this Agreement, shall not constitute a defense to the enforcement of the confidentiality provisions in this Agreement.
-
- Recipient acknowledges and agrees that Franchisor and Franchisee are intended third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement and that they each are independently entitled to enforce any provision of this Agreement.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 102–301)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dollar Rent A Car Franchise Disclosure Document, Dollar Rent A Car has specific remedies for violations of the confidentiality agreement. The agreement acknowledges that any violation by the recipient (typically a managerial employee or owner) will cause irreparable harm.
Specifically, Dollar Rent A Car is entitled to seek an injunction to prevent or halt any violation of the confidentiality agreement. This means Dollar Rent A Car can go to court to get an order that stops the recipient from further disclosing confidential information.
In addition to seeking an injunction, Dollar Rent A Car can pursue any other rights and remedies available under the agreement or otherwise available by law. The confidentiality agreement specifies that any claims the recipient may have against Dollar Rent A Car do not constitute a defense against enforcing the confidentiality provisions. Dollar Rent A Car and the franchisee are considered third-party beneficiaries of the agreement and can independently enforce its provisions.