To what extent is the North Dakota amendment to the Deer Solution Franchise Agreement effective?
Deer_Solution Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
t, with respect to such provision, that the jurisdictional requirements of the New York General Business Law, are met independently without reference to this amendment.
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this New York amendment to the Deer Solution Franchising LLC Franchise Agreement on the same date as the Franchise Agreement was executed.
| Franchisor: Deer Solution Franchising LLC | Franchisee: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature | Signature | ||
| Name and Title (please print) | Name (please print) | ||
| Dated | Dated Signature Name (please print) Dated |
NORTH DAKOTA FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
Amendments to the Deer Solution Franchise Agreement
In recognition of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law, Section 51-19, the parties to the attached Deer Solution Franchising LLC Franchise Agreement (the "Franchise Agreement") agree as follows:
The North Dakota Addendum is only applicable if you are a resident of North Dakota or if your Deer Solution Business will be located within the State of North Dakota.
-
- Article 15 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring North Dakota franchisees to sign a general release upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement are not enforceable in North Dakota."
-
- Article 16 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring North Dakota Franchisees to consent to termination or liquidated damages are not enforceable in North Dakota."
-
- Articles 6 and 17 of the Franchise Agreement are hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Covenants not to compete such as those mentioned above are generally considered unenforceable in the State of North Dakota."
-
- Article 18 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Covenants requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to the jurisdiction of courts outside of North Dakota may not be enforceable in North Dakota."
-
- Article 18 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "for North Dakota Franchisees, North Dakota law shall apply."
-
- Article 18 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring a franchisee to consent to a waiver of trial by jury are not enforceable under Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law."
-
- Article 18 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring the franchisee to consent to a waiver of exemplary and punitive damages are not enforceable under Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law."
-
- Article 18 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring a franchisee to consent to a limitation of claims within one year have been determined to be unfair, unjust, and inequitable within the intent of Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law. Therefore, for North Dakota franchisees, the statute of limitations under North Dakota Law will apply."
-
- No statement, questionnaire or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
-
- Each provision of this amendment shall be effective only to the extent, with respect to such provision, that the jurisdictional requirements of North Dakota Law are met independently without reference to this amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this North Dakota amendment to the Deer Solution Franchising LLC Franchise Agreement on the same date as the Franchise Agreement was executed.
| Franchisor: Deer Solution Franchising LLC | Franchisee: |
|---|---|
| Signature | Signature |
| Name and Title (please print) | Name (please print) |
| Dated | Dated Signature Name (please print) Dated |
WASHINGTON STATE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
Amendments to the Deer Solution Franchise Agreement
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the Franchise Agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the Franchise Agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the Franchise Agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
A release or waiver of rights executed by a franchisee may not include rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rule or order thereunder except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel. Provisions such as those which unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
Transfer fees are collectable to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee, including an employee of a franchisee, unless the employee's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $100,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). In addition, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an independent contractor of a franchisee under RCW 49.62.030 unless the independent contractor's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $250,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). As a result, any provisions contained in the Franchise Agreement or elsewhere that conflict with these limitations are void and unenforceable in Washington.
RCW 49.62.060 prohibits a franchisor from restricting, restraining, or prohibiting a franchisee from (i) soliciting or hiring any employee of a franchisee of the same franchisor or (ii) soliciting or hiring any employee of the franchisor. As a result, any such provisions contained in the Franchise Agreement or elsewhere are void and unenforceable in Washington.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 55–246)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Deer Solution Franchise Disclosure Document, the North Dakota amendment to the franchise agreement is designed to ensure compliance with the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law, Section 51-19. The amendment's applicability is specifically limited to franchisees who are residents of North Dakota or whose Deer Solution business will be located within the state.
The amendment addresses several key areas of the franchise agreement. It stipulates that provisions requiring North Dakota franchisees to sign a general release upon renewal, consent to termination or liquidated damages, or adhere to covenants not to compete may not be enforceable in North Dakota. Additionally, the amendment states that North Dakota law will apply to North Dakota franchisees, and provisions requiring consent to jurisdiction of courts outside of North Dakota or waiver of trial by jury, exemplary, or punitive damages are not enforceable under Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law.
Further, the Deer Solution FDD specifies that any provision requiring arbitration or mediation at a remote location must be agreeable to all parties and not remote from the franchisee's place of business. It also voids any provision designating jurisdiction or venue outside of North Dakota for causes of action enforceable within the state. The amendment clarifies that franchisees cannot waive claims under state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Deer Solution or its representatives. Refund and cancellation provisions may not be applicable to franchises operating under North Dakota Law. These amendments collectively aim to protect the rights of Deer Solution franchisees in North Dakota under state law.