In Minnesota, is a Cinnaholic franchisee required to consent to the Franchisor obtaining injunctive relief?

According to Cinnaholic's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee in Minnesota is not required to consent to Cinnaholic obtaining injunctive relief. However, Cinnaholic retains the right to seek and obtain injunctive relief under appropriate circumstances. The document also references Minnesota Rule 2860.4400(J), which indicates that a court will determine if a bond is required in such cases. This means that while Cinnaholic can pursue injunctive relief, the franchisee's consent is not a prerequisite, and the court will oversee the process, including the potential requirement of a bond.

This provision is important for prospective franchisees in Minnesota as it clarifies their rights and obligations regarding injunctive relief. It ensures that franchisees are not forced to consent to such measures, providing them with a degree of protection. At the same time, it allows Cinnaholic to seek injunctive relief when necessary, maintaining its ability to protect its interests.

It is important for potential Cinnaholic franchisees in Minnesota to understand the implications of this clause. While they are not required to consent to injunctive relief, they should be aware that Cinnaholic can still pursue it through the courts. Franchisees should also familiarize themselves with Minnesota Rule 2860.4400(J) to understand the court's role in determining whether a bond is required. This knowledge will help them navigate any potential disputes or legal actions related to injunctive relief during the franchise term.