Is a Churchs Chicken developer allowed to have conflicts with other third-party agreements?
Churchs_Chicken Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Execution of this Agreement or such other agreements by Developer does not and will not conflict with or interfere with, directly or indirectly, intentionally or otherwise, with the terms of any other agreement with any other third party to which Developer or any person with an ownership interest in Developer is a party.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 68–406)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Churchs Chicken's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a developer's execution of the Development Agreement or other related agreements must not conflict with any existing third-party agreements. This means that before signing any agreements with Churchs Chicken, a prospective developer needs to ensure that their obligations under those agreements do not contradict or interfere with any prior commitments they have made to other parties.
This requirement protects Churchs Chicken by ensuring that developers are fully available and capable of fulfilling their obligations to the franchise. If a developer were bound by conflicting agreements, it could hinder their ability to develop Churchs Chicken restaurants effectively, potentially harming the brand's growth and reputation.
For a prospective Churchs Chicken developer, this underscores the importance of carefully reviewing all existing contracts and obligations before entering into an agreement with Churchs Chicken. It may be prudent to seek legal counsel to assess potential conflicts and ensure full compliance. Failure to do so could result in a breach of contract with either Churchs Chicken or the third party, leading to legal and financial repercussions.