What is the impact of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act on the Chesters franchise agreement?
Chesters Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
y grounds for default or termination stated in the franchise agreement does not constitute "reasonable cause," as that term may be defined in the Virginia Retail Franchising Act or the laws of Virginia, that provision may not be enforceable.
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON ADDENDUM TO FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT, FRANCHISE REPRESENTATIONS, AND RELATED AGREEMENTS
The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, are incorporated into, and modify the Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement, and all related agreements regardless of anything to the contrary contained therein. This Addendum applies if: (a) the offer to sell a franchise is accepted in Washington; (b) the purchaser of the franchise is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) the franchised business that is the subject of the sale is to be located or operated, wholly or partly, in Washington.
- Conflict of Laws. In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
-
- Franchisee Bill of Rights. RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor. Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.
-
- Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation. In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
-
- General Release. A release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement or related agreements purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rules or orders thereunder is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2). In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Statute of Limitations and Waiver of Jury Trial. Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
-
- Transfer Fees. Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
-
- Termination by Franchisee. The franchisee may terminate the franchise agreement under any grounds permitted under state law.
-
- Certain Buy-Back Provisions. Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee's business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee's consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause.
-
- Fair and Reasonable Pricing. Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements that requires the franchisee to purchase or rent any product or service for more than a fair and reasonable price is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(d).
-
- Waiver of Exemplary & Punitive Damages. RCW 19.100.190 permits franchisees to seek treble damages under certain circumstances. Accordingly, provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere requiring franchisees to waive exemplary, punitive, or similar damages are void, except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Franchisor's Business Judgement. Provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements stating that the franchisor may exercise its discretion on the basis of its reasonable business judgment may be limited or superseded by RCW 19.100.180(1), which requires the parties to deal with each other in good faith.
-
- Indemnification. Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements requiring the franchisee to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or other parties is hereby modified such that the franchisee has no obligation to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or any other indemnified party for losses or liabilities to the extent that they are caused by the indemnified party's negligence, willful misconduct, strict liability, or fraud.
-
Source: Item 23 — **RECEIPTS (FDD pages 48–197)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 FDD, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act significantly impacts the Chesters franchise agreement for franchises located or sold in Washington. An addendum to the franchise agreement specifically addresses Washington law, stating that its provisions are integral to and modify the standard agreement. This addendum applies if the franchise offer is accepted in Washington, the purchaser is a Washington resident, or the franchised business operates in Washington.
The Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act takes precedence over conflicting laws. RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement related to the franchisee's relationship with Chesters, particularly in termination and renewal. Court decisions can also override the franchise agreement. Any release or waiver of rights that requires a franchisee to waive compliance with the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is void unless it's part of a negotiated settlement with independent counsel after the agreement is in effect, as per RCW 19.100.220(2). This also applies to renewals or transfers.
The FDD states that provisions that unreasonably limit the statute of limitations for claims or rights, such as the right to a jury trial, under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act may not be enforceable. The franchisee can terminate the agreement on any grounds permitted by state law. Provisions allowing Chesters to repurchase the franchise without the franchisee's consent during the term are unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless terminated for good cause. Any requirement to purchase or rent products/services at unfair prices is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(d).
Moreover, RCW 49.62.060 prohibits Chesters from restricting a franchisee from soliciting or hiring employees of other Chesters franchisees or employees of Chesters itself; any conflicting provisions are void. Statements or acknowledgments waiving claims under state franchise law or disclaiming reliance on franchisor statements are ineffective. Provisions that prohibit franchisees from communicating with regulators are inconsistent with the Franchise Disclosure Document and unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(h). In arbitration or mediation, the site will be in Washington or a mutually agreed-upon location. Franchisees can bring actions related to franchise sales or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act in Washington. Transfer fees are only collectable to the extent they reflect reasonable costs.
Prospective Chesters franchisees in Washington should carefully review the Washington addendum and understand how it modifies the standard franchise agreement to comply with Washington law. They should also consult with an attorney to ensure full comprehension of their rights and obligations under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act.