In the event of conflicting laws, which law prevails for a Chesters franchise in Washington?

According to Chesters's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchises located in Washington, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act will prevail if there is a conflict of laws. Specifically, chapter 19.100 RCW of this act takes precedence over other conflicting laws. This addendum modifies the franchise agreement and all related agreements for franchises in Washington. This applies if the franchise offer is accepted in Washington, the purchaser is a Washington resident, or the franchised business operates in Washington.

This means that certain provisions in the standard Chesters franchise agreement may not be enforceable in Washington if they contradict the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. This act is designed to protect franchisees and ensure fair practices. For example, RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement concerning termination and renewal.

Prospective Chesters franchisees in Washington should carefully review the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act to understand their rights and protections under state law. They should also consult with an attorney to ensure that the franchise agreement complies with Washington law and that their interests are adequately protected. This addendum highlights the importance of understanding state-specific franchise laws, as they can significantly impact the franchisee-franchisor relationship.