What aspects of the Chesters franchise agreement are subject to state law in Washington?
Chesters Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
y grounds for default or termination stated in the franchise agreement does not constitute "reasonable cause," as that term may be defined in the Virginia Retail Franchising Act or the laws of Virginia, that provision may not be enforceable.
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON ADDENDUM TO FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT, FRANCHISE REPRESENTATIONS, AND RELATED AGREEMENTS
The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, are incorporated into, and modify the Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement, and all related agreements regardless of anything to the contrary contained therein. This Addendum applies if: (a) the offer to sell a franchise is accepted in Washington; (b) the purchaser of the franchise is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) the franchised business that is the subject of the sale is to be located or operated, wholly or partly, in Washington.
- Conflict of Laws. In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
-
- Franchisee Bill of Rights. RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor. Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.
-
- Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation. In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
-
- General Release. A release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement or related agreements purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rules or orders thereunder is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2). In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Statute of Limitations and Waiver of Jury Trial. Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
-
- Transfer Fees. Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
-
- Termination by Franchisee. The franchisee may terminate the franchise agreement under any grounds permitted under state law.
-
- Certain Buy-Back Provisions. Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee's business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee's consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause.
-
- Fair and Reasonable Pricing. Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements that requires the franchisee to purchase or rent any product or service for more than a fair and reasonable price is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(d).
-
- Waiver of Exemplary & Punitive Damages. RCW 19.100.190 permits franchisees to seek treble damages under certain circumstances. Accordingly, provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere requiring franchisees to waive exemplary, punitive, or similar damages are void, except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Franchisor's Business Judgement. Provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements stating that the franchisor may exercise its discretion on the basis of its reasonable business judgment may be limited or superseded by RCW 19.100.180(1), which requires the parties to deal with each other in good faith.
-
- Indemnification.
Source: Item 23 — **RECEIPTS (FDD pages 48–197)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Chesters's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, several aspects of the franchise agreement are subject to Washington state law. The Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, takes precedence in the event of conflicting laws. This means that if any part of the franchise agreement clashes with this Washington law, the state law will be followed.
RCW 19.100.180, Washington's Franchisee Bill of Rights, may also override specific provisions in the franchise agreement, especially those concerning the franchisee's relationship with Chesters regarding termination and renewal. Court decisions could also supersede the franchise agreement. Furthermore, any release or waiver of rights that requires a franchisee to waive compliance with the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is void unless it meets specific conditions, such as being part of a negotiated settlement with independent counsel after the agreement is in effect, as per RCW 19.100.220(2).
Additionally, provisions that unreasonably restrict the statute of limitations for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or limit rights and remedies under the Act, such as the right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable. Transfer fees are only collectable if they reflect Chesters's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer. The franchisee can terminate the franchise agreement on any grounds permitted by state law. Provisions allowing Chesters to repurchase the franchisee's business without consent during the term, unless terminated for good cause, are unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(j). Any requirement to purchase or rent products or services at more than a fair and reasonable price is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(d).
Moreover, Chesters cannot restrict a franchisee from soliciting or hiring employees of other Chesters franchisees or Chesters itself, as per RCW 49.62.060. Statements, questionnaires, or acknowledgments signed by the franchisee cannot waive claims under state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Chesters or its representatives. Any provision prohibiting a franchisee from communicating with regulators is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(h). Finally, franchisees have the right to bring actions related to franchise sales or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act in Washington, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement.