What item in the Buona Franchise Disclosure Document is amended regarding litigation in the California addendum?
Buona Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-
- Item 3 of the Franchise Disclosure Document on "Litigation" is amended by the addition of the following:
- Neither Franchisor, nor any person or franchise broker in Item 2 of the FDD is subject to any currently effective order of any national securities association or national securities exchange, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. 78a et seq., suspending or expelling such persons from membership in such association or exchange.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 78)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Buona's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Item 3, which covers litigation, is amended in the California addendum. The amendment specifies that neither Buona, nor any person or franchise broker mentioned in Item 2 of the FDD, is subject to any currently effective order from a national securities association or exchange. This order would suspend or expel such persons from membership in the association or exchange, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
This amendment provides additional assurance to potential franchisees in California regarding the legal standing and conduct of Buona and its representatives. It confirms that they are not under any disciplinary orders related to securities violations, which could impact their ability to operate ethically and legally. This information is particularly relevant for franchisees in California, as the state's franchise laws emphasize transparency and protection for franchisees.
Prospective franchisees should carefully review Item 3 and the California addendum to fully understand the scope of this amendment and its implications. It is also advisable to consult with a legal professional to assess the potential risks and benefits associated with this specific clause and the overall franchise agreement.