Under what circumstances might RCW 19.100.180 supersede the Annex Brands Franchise Agreement?
Annex_Brands Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- (3) RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the Franchise Agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the Franchise Agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 110–299)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Annex Brands' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, RCW 19.100.180, which is part of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, may take precedence over the standard franchise agreement in specific situations. This means that certain provisions of the franchise agreement might not be enforceable if they conflict with the stipulations of RCW 19.100.180.
Specifically, the FDD indicates that RCW 19.100.180 could supersede the Annex Brands Franchise Agreement regarding the termination and renewal of a franchise. This implies that the legal requirements in Washington State related to franchise termination and renewal, as defined by RCW 19.100.180, would override any conflicting terms outlined in the franchise agreement.
In practical terms, this means that if Annex Brands attempts to terminate or chooses not to renew a franchise in Washington, the franchisee may have additional rights or protections under RCW 19.100.180 that are not explicitly stated in the franchise agreement. Franchisees should be aware of these potential discrepancies and consult with legal counsel to understand their rights under Washington law. Additionally, court decisions may also supersede the Franchise Agreement in areas of termination and renewal.