factual

How does the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act affect the Zoomin Groomin franchise agreement?

Zoomin_Groomin Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

ELATED AGREEMENT**

The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, are incorporated into, and modify the Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement, and all related agreements regardless of anything to the contrary contained therein. This Addendum applies if: (a) the offer to sell a franchise is accepted in Washington; (b) the purchaser of the franchise is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) the franchised business that is the subject of the sale is to be located or operated, wholly or partly, in Washington.

    1. Conflict of Laws. In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
    1. Franchisee Bill of Rights. RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor. Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.
    1. Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation. In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
    1. General Release. A release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement or related agreements purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rules or orders thereunder is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2). In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).
    1. Statute of Limitations and Waiver of Jury Trial. Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
    1. Transfer Fees. Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
    1. Termination by Franchisee. The franchisee may terminate the franchise agreement under any grounds permitted under state law.
    1. Certain Buy-Back Provisions. Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee's business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee's consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause.
    1. Fair and Reasonable Pricing. Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements that requires the franchisee to purchase or rent any product or service for more than a fair and reasonable price is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(d).
    1. Waiver of Exemplary & Punitive Damages. RCW 19.100.190 permits franchisees to seek treble damages under certain circumstances. Accordingly, provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere requiring franchisees to waive exemplary, punitive, or similar damages are void, except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2).
    1. Franchisor's Business Judgement. Provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements stating that the franchisor may exercise its discretion on the basis of its reasonable business judgment may be limited or superseded by RCW 19.100.180(1), which requires the parties to deal with each other in good faith.
    1. Indemnification. Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements requiring the franchisee to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or other parties is hereby modified such that the franchisee has no obligation to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or any other indemnified party for losses or liabilities to the extent that they are caused by the indemnified party's negligence, willful misconduct, strict liability, or fraud.
    1. Attorneys' Fees. If the franchise agreement or related agreements require a franchisee to reimburse the franchisor for court costs or expenses, including attorneys' fees, such provision applies only if the franchisor is the prevailing party in any judicial or arbitration proceeding.
    1. Noncompetition Covenants.

Source: Item 17 — g. of the Disclosure Document is modified to state that, in addition to the grounds for immediate termination specified in Item 17.h., the franchisor can terminate upon written notice and a 60 day opportunity to cure for a breach of the Franchise Agreement. (FDD pages 51–65)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Zoomin Groomin's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act (WFIPA) significantly modifies the franchise agreement for franchisees in Washington state. In the event of any conflict between the franchise agreement and the WFIPA, the provisions of the WFIPA will take precedence. RCW 19.100.180, also known as the Franchisee Bill of Rights, may override specific terms in the franchise agreement, especially concerning termination and renewal. Court decisions may also supersede the franchise agreement. Any attempt to waive compliance with the WFIPA within the franchise agreement is void unless it's part of a negotiated settlement with independent legal representation after the agreement is in effect, or during a renewal or transfer as provided in RCW 19.100.220(2). Provisions that unreasonably limit the statute of limitations for claims under the WFIPA or waive rights like a jury trial may not be enforceable.

The WFIPA impacts dispute resolution by mandating that any arbitration or mediation for a franchise purchased in Washington must occur within the state, unless otherwise agreed upon or determined by the arbitrator or mediator. Franchisees can also bring legal actions related to franchise sales or WFIPA violations in Washington if litigation isn't precluded by the agreement.

Several specific clauses within the Zoomin Groomin franchise agreement are explicitly modified or rendered unenforceable in Washington. Franchisees are not obligated to indemnify Zoomin Groomin for losses resulting from the franchisor's negligence, misconduct, or fraud. If the franchise agreement requires the franchisee to reimburse Zoomin Groomin for legal costs, this only applies if Zoomin Groomin prevails in the legal proceeding. Noncompetition covenants are unenforceable against an employee of a Zoomin Groomin franchisee unless their annualized earnings exceed $100,000, or against an independent contractor unless their annualized earnings exceed $250,000; these amounts will be adjusted annually for inflation. Furthermore, Zoomin Groomin cannot restrict a franchisee from soliciting or hiring employees of other Zoomin Groomin franchisees or employees of Zoomin Groomin itself.

Finally, any statement or acknowledgment signed by the franchisee at the start of the franchise relationship cannot waive claims under state franchise law, including fraud, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Zoomin Groomin or its representatives. Provisions prohibiting communication with regulators are inconsistent with the Franchise Disclosure Document and unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(h).

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.