Can a Zoomin Groomin franchisee in Minnesota consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief?
Zoomin_Groomin Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
The franchisee cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief.
The franchisor may seek injunctive relief.
See Minn.
Rules 2860.4400J.
- Also, a court will determine if a bond is required.
Source: Item 17 — g. of the Disclosure Document is modified to state that, in addition to the grounds for immediate termination specified in Item 17.h., the franchisor can terminate upon written notice and a 60 day opportunity to cure for a breach of the Franchise Agreement. (FDD pages 51–65)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Zoomin Groomin's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee in Minnesota cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief. This protection is explicitly stated within the Minnesota Addenda to the Disclosure Document, ensuring that franchisees are not compelled to agree to terms that might disadvantage them in legal proceedings. The franchisor, however, retains the right to seek injunctive relief. The determination of whether a bond is required in such cases will be made by the court. This provision is in place to protect the franchisee's rights under Minnesota law.
This means that Zoomin Groomin franchisees in Minnesota are safeguarded from being forced into agreements that would allow the franchisor to easily obtain court orders (injunctive relief) against them. Injunctive relief can significantly impact a franchisee's operations, so this protection ensures a fairer legal landscape. The FDD specifies that the franchisor may still seek injunctive relief, but the franchisee's consent cannot be a prerequisite.
This stipulation is particularly important because it aligns with Minnesota's broader stance on protecting franchisees' rights, as evidenced by other regulations mentioned in the FDD, such as those concerning litigation venues, jury trial waivers, and consent to liquidated damages. Prospective Zoomin Groomin franchisees in Minnesota should understand that this provision is designed to balance the legal power between the franchisor and franchisee, preventing potential overreach by the franchisor through forced consent.