Can a Zoomin Groomin franchisee bring an action in Washington for a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act?
Zoomin_Groomin Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-
- Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation. In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
Source: Item 17 — g. of the Disclosure Document is modified to state that, in addition to the grounds for immediate termination specified in Item 17.h., the franchisor can terminate upon written notice and a 60 day opportunity to cure for a breach of the Franchise Agreement. (FDD pages 51–65)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Zoomin Groomin's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee may bring an action in Washington for a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. Specifically, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee can initiate legal proceedings in Washington if the action arises from the sale of franchises or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. This provision ensures that franchisees have a legal avenue within the state to address grievances related to franchise operations and compliance with state laws.
This right is further protected by stipulations within the Washington Addendum that address potential conflicts of law. In the event of any conflict, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act will take precedence. Additionally, any release or waiver of rights that would prevent a franchisee from complying with the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is considered void, unless it is executed as part of a negotiated settlement with independent counsel after the franchise agreement is already in effect.
These protections extend to other aspects of the franchise relationship, such as the statute of limitations and the right to a jury trial. Provisions that unreasonably restrict the statute of limitations for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or limit rights and remedies under the Act may not be enforceable. This comprehensive approach ensures that Zoomin Groomin franchisees in Washington have significant legal recourse and protection under state law, safeguarding their rights and interests throughout the franchise term.