What determines if a bond is required when Zoomin Groomin seeks injunctive relief in Minnesota?
Zoomin_Groomin Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
The franchisee cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief.
The franchisor may seek injunctive relief.
See Minn.
Rules 2860.4400J.
- Also, a court will determine if a bond is required.
Source: Item 17 — g. of the Disclosure Document is modified to state that, in addition to the grounds for immediate termination specified in Item 17.h., the franchisor can terminate upon written notice and a 60 day opportunity to cure for a breach of the Franchise Agreement. (FDD pages 51–65)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Zoomin Groomin FDD, whether a bond is required when Zoomin Groomin seeks injunctive relief against a franchisee in Minnesota is determined by a court. This means that if Zoomin Groomin pursues injunctive relief in Minnesota, the court will assess the situation and decide if a bond is necessary.
This addendum to the franchise agreement ensures that the decision to require a bond is not unilaterally made by Zoomin Groomin but is subject to judicial review. This provides a layer of protection for the franchisee, as the court will consider the specific circumstances and legal standards before mandating a bond.
For a prospective Zoomin Groomin franchisee in Minnesota, this means that if they face a situation where Zoomin Groomin seeks an injunction, they have the right to have a court determine whether a bond is required. This can potentially save the franchisee from incurring additional costs if the court deems a bond unnecessary. Franchisees should consult with a legal professional to understand their rights and obligations in such situations.