In Minnesota, can a Stretch Zone franchisee consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief?

According to Stretch Zone's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee in Minnesota cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief. This protection is explicitly stated in the Minnesota Addendum to the Franchise Disclosure Document, which references Minnesota Rules 2860.4400. While Stretch Zone may seek injunctive relief, the franchisee's consent is not required or permitted. A court will determine if a bond is required.

This provision is significant for prospective Stretch Zone franchisees in Minnesota because it ensures they cannot be compelled to agree in advance to actions that might negatively impact their business. Injunctive relief can have serious consequences, potentially halting operations or imposing specific restrictions. By prohibiting mandatory consent, Minnesota law aims to protect franchisees from undue pressure or unfair contract terms.

This type of protection is not uncommon in franchise law, as many states have regulations designed to balance the power dynamic between franchisors and franchisees. These regulations often address issues such as termination, renewal, and dispute resolution. Franchisees should be aware of these protections and consult with legal counsel to fully understand their rights under state law.

Therefore, a prospective Stretch Zone franchisee in Minnesota can be assured that they cannot be forced to consent to injunctive relief sought by the franchisor, providing an additional layer of legal protection.