Has Petro Stopping Center been involved in any concluded litigation related to the franchise?

According to the 2025 FDD, Petro Stopping Center states that there is no concluded litigation related to the franchise that requires disclosure in Item 3. However, the document does list concluded litigation involving Petro Stopping Center's parents and affiliates.

Specifically, the FDD details cases such as Foster, et al. v. BP North America Petroleum Inc., et al, filed January 25, 2007, and Richard Galauski et al v. Amerada Hess Corporation, et al, filed December 14, 2006. Additionally, it mentions a settlement reached in March 2012 where BP, BPWCP, and BPCNA agreed to settle pending cases for $5 million, which was approved by the Court of Appeals on September 6, 2017, and ultimately had its petition for review denied by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 19, 2018. Another case, State of California, et al v. BP America Production Company, et al, resulted in a settlement where BP agreed to pay $102 million to the State of California on January 10, 2018.

While Petro Stopping Center itself may not be directly involved in current litigation, prospective franchisees should be aware of the legal history of its parent companies. This information can be crucial for understanding the broader legal landscape in which Petro Stopping Center operates and any potential indirect impacts on the franchise system.