For Petro Stopping Center, how is the amount recognized for decommissioning liabilities determined?
Petro_Stopping_Center Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
e determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax risk-free rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized within finance costs. Provisions are discounted using a nominal discount rate of 4.5% (2023 4%).
Provisions are split between amounts expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date (current) and amounts expected to be settled later (non-current).
Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will only be confirmed by future events not wholly within the control of the Company, or present obligations where it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required or the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements but are disclosed, if material, unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is considered remote.
Decommissioning
Liabilities for decommissioning costs are recognized when the Company has an obligation to plug and abandon a well, dismantle and remove a facility or an item of plant and to restore the site on which it is located, and when a reliable estimate of that liability can be made. Where an obligation exists for a new facility or item of plant, such as oil and natural gas production or transportation facilities, this liability will be recognized on construction or installation. Similarly, where an obligation exists for a well, this liability is recognized when it is drilled. An obligation for decommissioning may also crystallize during the period of operation of a well, facility or item of plant through a change in legislation or through a decision to terminate operations; an obligation may also arise in cases where an asset has been sold but the subsequent owner is no longer able to fulfil its decommissioning obligations, for example due to bankruptcy. The amount recognized is the present value of the estimated future expenditure determined in accordance with local conditions and requirements. The provision for the costs of decommissioning wells, production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives is estimated using existing technology, at future prices, depending on the expected timing of the activity, and discounted using a nominal discount rate.
An amount equivalent to the decommissioning provision is recognized as part of the corresponding intangible asset (in the case of an exploration or appraisal well) or property, plant and equipment. The decommissioning portion of the property, plant and equipment is subsequently depreciated at the same rate as the rest of the asset. Other than the unwinding of discount on or utilization of the provision, any change in the present value of the estimated expenditure is reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding asset where that asset is generating or is expected to generate future economic benefits.
Environmental expenditures and liabilities
Environmental expenditures that are required in order for the Company to obtain future economic benefits from its assets are capitalized as part of those assets. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to future earnings are expensed.
Liabilities for environmental costs are recognized when a clean-up is probable and the associated costs can be reliably estimated. Generally, the timing of recognition of these provisions coincides with the commitment to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on divestment or on closure of inactive sites.
The amount recognized is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation. Provisions for environmental liabilities have been estimated using existing technology, at future prices and discounted using a nominal discount rate.
Emissions
Liabilities for emissions are recognized when the cumulative volumes of gases emitted by the Company at the end of the reporting period exceed the allowances granted free of charge held for own use or a set baseline for emissions. The provision is measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. It is based on the excess of actual emissions over the free allowances held or set baseline in tonnes (or other appropriate quantity) and is valued at the actual cost of any allowances that have been purchased and held for own use on a first-in-first-out (FIFO) basis, and, if insufficient allowances are held, for the remaining requirement on the basis of the spot market price of allowances at the balance sheet date. The majority of these provisions are typically settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date however certain schemes may
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
have longer compliance periods. The cost of allowances purchased to cover a shortfall is recognized separately on the balance sheet as an intangible asset unless the emission allowances acquired or generated by the group are risk-managed by the trading and shipping function, then they are recognized on the balance sheet as inventory.
Restructuring provisions
Restructuring provisions are recognized where a detailed formal plan exists, and a valid expectation of risk of redundancy has been made to those affected but where the specific outcomes remain uncertain. Where formal redundancy offers have been made, the obligations for those amounts are reported as payables and, if not, as provisions if unpaid at the year-end
Significant judgements and estimates: provisions
The Company holds provisions for the future decommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives. The largest decommissioning obligations facing the Company relate to the plugging and abandonment of wells and the removal and disposal of oil and natural gas platforms and pipelines around the world. Most of these decommissioning events are many years in the future and the precise requirements that will have to be met when the removal event occurs are uncertain. Decommissioning technologies and costs are constantly changing, as are political, environmental, safety and public expectations.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS **RECEIPTS (FDD pages 87–131)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Petro Stopping Center's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the amount recognized for decommissioning liabilities is the present value of the estimated future expenditure, determined based on local conditions and requirements. This applies when the company has an obligation to plug and abandon a well, dismantle and remove a facility, or restore a site. The provision for decommissioning costs of wells, production facilities, and pipelines is estimated using existing technology at future prices, depending on the expected timing of the activity, and is discounted using a nominal discount rate. An equivalent amount is recognized as part of the corresponding intangible asset or property, plant, and equipment, with the decommissioning portion of the property being depreciated at the same rate as the rest of the asset. Any changes in the present value of the estimated expenditure are reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding asset, provided that the asset is generating or is expected to generate future economic benefits.
For a prospective Petro Stopping Center franchisee, this means that decommissioning liabilities are a significant consideration, especially concerning oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines. The largest decommissioning obligations relate to plugging and abandoning wells and removing oil and natural gas platforms and pipelines. These events are often far in the future, and the exact requirements are uncertain, making estimation necessary. Changes in decommissioning technologies, costs, and political, environmental, safety, and public expectations can all impact these estimates. The timing and amounts of future cash flows are subject to uncertainty, requiring careful estimation when determining the provisions to be recognized.
Furthermore, if Petro Stopping Center sells oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines to third parties, judgment is required to assess whether the new owner can meet their decommissioning obligations. If the new owner cannot fulfill these obligations, Petro Stopping Center may remain responsible for decommissioning. This assessment involves evaluating local legal requirements and the financial standing of the owner. As of December 31, 2024, the company had $0.7 billion in decommissioning provisions for assets previously sold to third parties where the decommissioning obligation was transferred to the new owner. Decommissioning provisions associated with refineries are generally not recognized because their potential obligations cannot be measured due to indeterminate settlement dates. Obligations may arise if refineries cease manufacturing operations, and such obligations would be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to determine potential settlement dates.
Changes in assumptions related to the company's provisions could materially change their carrying amounts within the next financial year. For example, a 1.0 percentage point increase in the nominal discount rate could decrease the company's provision balances by approximately $852 million. The discounting impact on the company's decommissioning provisions for oil and gas properties in the oil productions & operations and gas & low carbon energy segments of a two-year change in the timing of expected future decommissioning expenditures is approximately $151 million. If all expected future decommissioning expenditures were 10% higher, the decommissioning provisions would increase by approximately $564 million. A one percentage point increase in the inflation rate applied to upstream decommissioning costs could increase the decommissioning provision by approximately $1,090 million.