In the event of a conflict of laws, which provisions prevail for Mrcool franchises in Washington?

According to Mrcool's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Washington FDD Amendment addresses conflict of laws for franchises purchased in Washington state. Specifically, in the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW, will take precedence. This amendment ensures that Mrcool franchisees in Washington are protected by their state's franchise laws.

This means that if there is ever a disagreement between what the standard Mrcool franchise agreement says and what the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act says, the state law will be followed. This covers various aspects of the franchise relationship, including the sale of franchises and any violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act.

This provision is particularly important for prospective Mrcool franchisees in Washington as it reinforces their rights and protections under state law. It ensures that the franchise agreement cannot override the safeguards provided by the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, offering an additional layer of security and legal recourse for franchisees operating in Washington.