factual

What state's laws govern the Mr. Sandless Franchise Agreement?

Mr_Sandless Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

| w. Choice of law | 24.1 | | Agreement is governed by the laws of Pennsylvania. (subject to state law) | | q. | Non-competition covenants during the term of the franchise | 18.1 | During the term of the Franchise Agreement, you may not, directly or indirectly: (i) own, maintain, engage in, be employed by, lend money to, extend credit to or have any interest in any other business offering services and/or products similar to those offered under the System, except for your operation of any other Mr. Sandless; (ii) employ or seek to employ any person who is at that time employed by us, our affiliates or any other franchisee in the System, or otherwise directly or indirectly induce or seek to induce that person to leave his or her employment; or (iii) divert or attempt to divert any business or customer of the Business to any competitor, by direct or indirect inducement or otherwise, or do or perform, directly or indirectly, any other act injurious or prejudicial to the goodwill associated with the Proprietary Marks or the System. Subject to state law. |

Section 19-28.1-14 of the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act provides that:

"A provision in a franchise agreement restricting jurisdiction or venue to a forum outside of this state or requiring the application of the laws of another state is void with respect to a claim otherwise enforceable under this Act."

STATE ADDENDUM REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF INDIANA

  1. To be added to Item 3 of the Disclosure Document, is the following statement:

There are presently no arbitration proceedings to which the Franchisor is a party.

    1. Item 17 of the Disclosure Document is amended to reflect the requirement under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (9), which states that any post term non-compete covenant must not extend beyond the franchisee's designated territory.
      1. Item 17 is amended to state that this is subject to Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10).
    1. Under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10), jurisdiction and venue must be in Indiana if the franchisee so requests. This amends Article 24 of the Franchise Agreement.
      1. Under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10), franchisee may not agree to waive any claims or rights.

STATE SPECIFIC ADDENDUM FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

In recognition of the restrictions contained in Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, the Franchise Disclosure Document for Mr. Sandless Franchise LLC for use in the Commonwealth of Virginia shall be amended as follows:

The following statement is added to Item 5:

The Virginia State Corporation Commission's Division of Securities and Retail Franchising requires us to defer payment of the initial franchise fee and other initial payments owed by franchisees to the franchisor until the franchisor has completed its pre- opening obligations under the franchise agreement.

DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

THE STATE OF MICHIGAN PROHIBITS CERTAIN UNFAIR PROVISIONS THAT ARE SOMETIMES IN FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS ARE IN THESE FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS, THE PROVISIONS ARE VOID AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED AGAINST YOU:

Source: Item 17 — RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (FDD pages 30–34)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Mr. Sandless's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Franchise Agreement is generally governed by the laws of Pennsylvania. However, this is explicitly stated to be 'subject to state law,' meaning that certain provisions may be superseded or modified by the laws of the state in which the franchisee operates.

Several states, including Indiana, Maryland, Virginia, Michigan, and Rhode Island, have specific addenda that modify the Franchise Agreement to comply with their local franchise laws. These addenda address issues such as non-compete clauses, dispute resolution, franchisee rights, and financial assurances. For example, Rhode Island law voids any provision restricting jurisdiction or requiring the application of another state's laws. Virginia requires deferral of initial franchise fee payments until pre-opening obligations are met. Michigan prohibits certain unfair provisions that are sometimes in franchise documents.

Therefore, while Pennsylvania law forms the basis of the agreement, franchisees must be aware of and understand the specific state addendum applicable to their location, as these addenda can significantly alter their rights and obligations under the Mr. Sandless Franchise Agreement. Prospective franchisees should carefully review these state-specific provisions with legal counsel to ensure full compliance and understanding.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.