Is the Mr. Sandless Franchise Agreement subject to state law?
Mr_Sandless Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
[Item 17: RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION]
STATE ADDENDUM REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF INDIANA
- To be added to Item 3 of the Disclosure Document, is the following statement:
There are presently no arbitration proceedings to which the Franchisor is a party.
-
- Item 17 of the Disclosure Document is amended to reflect the requirement under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (9), which states that any post term non-compete covenant must not extend beyond the franchisee's designated territory.
-
- Item 17 is amended to state that this is subject to Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10).
-
- Under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10), jurisdiction and venue must be in Indiana if the franchisee so requests. This amends Article 24 of the Franchise Agreement.
-
- Under Indiana Code 23-2-2.7-1 (10), franchisee may not agree to waive any claims or rights.
STATE ADDENDUM REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF MARYLAND
This will serve as the State Addendum for Mr. Sandless Franchise LLC for the State of Maryland for the Mr. Sandless Franchise Disclosure Document and for its Franchise Agreement. The amendments to the Franchise Agreement included in this addendum have been agreed to by the parties.
The provision contained in the termination sections of the Franchise Agreement may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C.
Section 101 et seq.).
Item 11 of the Franchise Disclosure Document shall be amended to state that a franchisee may obtain an accounting of the advertising fund as required by COMAR 02.02.08.04B(2), by requesting same in a written request to Franchisor.
According to COMAR 02.02.08.16L, Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document shall be amended at the sections dealing with the issuance of general releases to the effect that the general release required as a condition of renewal and/or assignment/transfer are not intended to nor shall they act as a release, estoppel or waiver of any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
[Item 17: RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION]
The following amends Item 17 and is required to be included within the Disclosure Document and shall be deemed to supersede the language in the Disclosure Document itself:
Section 19-28.1-14 of the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act provides that:
"A provision in a franchise agreement restricting jurisdiction or venue to a forum outside of this state or requiring the application of the laws of another state is void with respect to a claim otherwise enforceable under this Act."
STATE SPECIFIC ADDENDUM FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
In recognition of the restrictions contained in Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, the Franchise Disclosure Document for Mr. Sandless Franchise LLC for use in the Commonwealth of Virginia shall be amended as follows:
The following statement is added to Item 5:
The Virginia State Corporation Commission's Division of Securities and Retail Franchising requires us to defer payment of the initial franchise fee and other initial payments owed by franchisees to the franchisor until the franchisor has completed its pre- opening obligations under the franchise agreement.
Additional Disclosure: The following statements are added to Item 17.h:
Pursuant to Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, it is unlawful for a franchisor to cancel a franchise without reasonable cause. If any grounds for default or termination stated in the franchise agreement and development agreement does not constitute "reasonable cause," as that the term may be defined in the Virginia Retail Franchising Act or the laws of Virginia, the provision may not be enforceable.
Pursuant to Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, it is unlawful for a franchisor to use undue influence to induce a franchisee to surrender any right given to him under the franchise. If any provision of the Franchise Agreement involves the use of undue influence by the franchisor to induce a franchisee to surrender any rights given to him under the franchise, that provision may not be enforceable.
[Item 17: RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION]
However, pursuant to Section 14-216(c)(25) of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, a franchisee is permitted to enter into litigation with the Franchisor in the State of Maryland, regardless of the language in the Franchise Agreement.
The franchise agreement is hereby amended to provide that the acknowledgements or representations of the franchisee which disclaim the occurrence and/or acknowledge the non-occurrence of acts that would constitute a violation of the Franchise Law are not intended to nor shall they act as a release, estoppel or waiver of any liability incurred under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
The first sentence of paragarph "E" beginning with "You acknowledge..", under the section titled "Background" of the Franchise Agreement, is hereby deleted in its entirety.
-
- Sections 27.1 through 27.5 of the Franchise Agreement are hereby deleted.
-
- To the extent of any inconsistencies, Item 5 and Section 10.1 of the Franchise Agreement are hereby amended to further state:
"Based upon Franchisor's financial condition, the Maryland Securities Commissioner has required a financial assurance. Therefore, Franchisor will defer collection of the Initial Franchise Fee and other initial fees payable to Franchisor until Franchisor has fulfilled its initial pre-opening obligations."
No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE LLC By: Name: Title: FRANCHISEE:
DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
THE STATE OF MICHIGAN PROHIBITS CERTAIN UNFAIR PROVISIONS THAT ARE SOMETIMES IN FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS ARE IN THESE FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS, THE PROVISIONS ARE VOID AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED AGAINST YOU:
- (a) A prohibition on the right of a franchisee to join an association of franchises.
| PROVISION | SECTION IN | SUMMARY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRANCHISE AGREEMENT | |||
| a. Length of the | 3.1 | 10 years | |
| franchise term | |||
| b. Renewal or extension of the term | 3.2 | If you have complied with the Franchise Agreement and certain conditions, you may enter into a successor franchise agreement for the franchise for 2 consecutive additional 5-year terms. | |
| c. Requirements for | 3.2 | You must be in compliance with the Franchise | |
| franchisee to renew or | Agreement; must have satisfied all monetary | ||
| extend | obligations owed to us and our affiliates; must be in | ||
| PROVISION | SECTION IN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT | SUMMARY | |
| t. Integration/merger clause | 25.1 | Only the terms of the Franchise Agreement are binding (subject to applicable federal and/or state law). Any representations or promises outside of the Franchise Disclosure Document and other agreements may not be enforceable. Nothing in the agreement or in any related agreement is intended to disclaim the representations made in the Franchise Disclosure Document. | |
| u. Dispute resolution by arbitration or mediation | 24.2, 24.3 | You must bring any dispute or claim to our President first for discussion before you may bring the dispute to a third party. At our option, all claims or disputes relating to the Franchise Agreement must be submitted first to mediation in Delaware County, Pennsylvania under the National Franchise Mediation Program (“NFMP”) in accordance with the NFMP’s mediation rules then in effect.(subject to state law) | |
| v. Choice of forum | 24.6 | Subject to state law, for any dispute not subject to or not resolved by mediation, the parties agree to litigate only in a court of general jurisdiction in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, or the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. | |
| w. Choice of law | 24.1 | Agreement is governed by the laws of Pennsylvania. (subject to state law) |
Source: Item 17 — RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (FDD pages 30–34)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
Yes, according to Mr. Sandless's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Franchise Agreement is subject to state law. Item 17 includes addenda for specific states like Indiana, Maryland, and Virginia, which modify certain provisions of the standard agreement to comply with local laws. These addenda address issues such as non-compete covenants, jurisdiction, venue, franchisee rights, and required disclosures. These modifications indicate that the Franchise Agreement is not uniformly applied across all states and is adapted to meet specific state regulatory requirements.
For instance, the Indiana addendum amends Item 17 to comply with Indiana Code, addressing post-term non-compete covenants and venue requirements. Similarly, the Maryland addendum modifies termination sections and requires specific amendments to Item 11 and Item 17 related to advertising fund accounting and general releases. The Virginia addendum includes statements about deferring initial franchise fee payments and restrictions on canceling a franchise without reasonable cause, as required by the Virginia Retail Franchising Act.
Furthermore, the table in Item 17 summarizes various provisions of the Franchise Agreement, noting that aspects such as dispute resolution, choice of forum, and choice of law are "subject to state law." This reinforces that while the agreement is governed by Pennsylvania law, certain provisions may be superseded or modified by the laws of the state in which the franchise is located. This means a Mr. Sandless franchisee needs to be aware of the specific state laws that apply to their franchise operation, as these laws can impact the enforceability and interpretation of the Franchise Agreement.
In Michigan, the disclosure indicates that certain unfair provisions sometimes found in franchise documents are void and cannot be enforced. This further emphasizes the importance of understanding state-specific franchise laws. Prospective Mr. Sandless franchisees should carefully review the state-specific addenda and consult with legal counsel to understand how local laws may affect their rights and obligations under the Franchise Agreement.