Does the choice of law for the Mr. Sandless agreement include Pennsylvania's conflict of law rules?

According to the 2025 Mr. Sandless Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement is governed by the laws of Pennsylvania. However, the agreement specifically excludes the application of Pennsylvania's conflict of law rules. This means that if there is a dispute, Pennsylvania law will be used to interpret the agreement, but the court will not apply Pennsylvania's rules to determine which state's laws should govern the dispute. This ensures that Pennsylvania law is applied directly, regardless of any potential conflicts with other states' laws.

For a prospective Mr. Sandless franchisee, this is important because it provides clarity and predictability regarding the legal framework that will govern the franchise agreement. By excluding Pennsylvania's conflict of law rules, Mr. Sandless aims to avoid any uncertainty or complications that could arise from applying different states' laws. This can be beneficial for franchisees as they can be confident that Pennsylvania law will be consistently applied in any legal disputes related to the franchise agreement.

This approach is fairly common in franchise agreements, as franchisors often prefer to have a single, consistent set of laws governing their agreements across different states. This simplifies legal compliance and reduces the risk of inconsistent interpretations. Franchisees should be aware of the governing law provision in their franchise agreement and understand its implications for their rights and obligations.