What are the implications of the litigation involving John T. Hewitt (Item 3) on Ledgers's ability to protect its trademarks as described in Item 13?
Ledgers Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
nk]
ITEM 3 LITIGATION
John T. Hewitt, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Loyalty, LLC, has been named in the following litigation:
Pending Actions:
Ira Lubert and John Martinson v. John T. Hewitt, ATAX, LLC, and Loyalty, LLC (Case No 250503829) filed May 30, 2025, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiffs are investors in ATAX, LLC, and claim that they were solicited to invest in ATAX as a qualified opportunity zone business (QOZB), yet it did not qualify as a QOZB. Further, Plaintiffs claim that, as a result of the non-QOZB status, the defendants promised certain changes, some of which defendants have not made, specifically an amendment to ATAX's Operating Agreement and certain financial controls. The Plaintiffs also allege that Hewitt, with the assistance of certain Loyalty employees, made cash withdrawals from ATAX and paid those funds to himself, to Loyalty, and to other Loyalty brand companies without ATAX Board approval. The Plaintiffs sue for (1) Fraud Against Defendant Hewitt, (2) Aiding and Abetting Fraud (Against Defendant Loyalty), (3) Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Against Defendants Hewitt and Loyalty), (4) Conversion (Against Defendants Hewitt and Loyalty), (5) Breach of Contract (Against Defendants Hewitt, Loyalty, and ATAX), (6) Unjust Enrichment (Against Defendants Hewitt and Loyalty), (7) Breach of Virginia Stock Corporation Act (Against Defendants Hewitt and Loyalty), and (8) Violation of Pennsylvania Voidable Transfers Act (Against Defendants Hewitt and Loyalty). Plaintiffs seek a judgment, an order rescinding their investments, redemption of their ownership interests at a fair value, monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, fees, and interest. Defendants offered to buy out the Plaintiffs' investments for a profit that would be beneficial to Plaintiffs. Defendants intend to file an Answer generally denying the allegations and vigorously contesting the claims made. No trial date has been set.
Fortis Lux Financial, Inc. and Tutum Strategies, LLC v. Loyalty Business Services, LLC a/k/a Ledgers USA, JSM Tax, Inc. d/b/a Ledgers, USA, and Loyalty, LLC d/b/a Loyalty Brands, filed May 9, 2025, before the American Arbitration Association for hearing in Virginia (AAA Case No. 01-25-0002-2722). The Claimants are an investment advisory and insurance products sales organization, and they entered a joint venture with Ledgers to develop or acquire accounting offices and then convert them to franchise locations. The Claimants allege that Ledgers committed fraud and fraud in the inducement by misrepresented its ability to deliver services to the acquisition target's clients to induce Claimant's to enter the joint venture. The Claimant's also allege that Ledgers breached the contract between the parties by failing to service the acquisition target clients. Claimants never signed a franchise agreement for the locations they opened. Claimants are seeking compensatory damages and lost expectation profit in an amount to be determined in the arbitration. Respondent filed an Answer on May 30, 2025, denying the claims and reserving the right to file counterclaims. No date has been set.
Concluded Actions:
JTH Tax LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service v. John T. Hewitt, Loyalty LLC, ATAX LLC, ATAX Franchise, Inc. and Yneva Marte (Case No.2:21-cv-00076-RBS-LRL) filed February 4, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Plaintiff filed the action alleging that ATAX franchisees maintained signage that is confusingly similar to trade dress and logos of the plaintiff. The Plaintiff also alleges that Mr. Hewitt tortiously interfered with certain contractual relations by discussing with existing and former franchisees of the Plaintiff opportunities at ATAX. The complaint alleges that Mr. Hewitt breached his employment agreement by sharing and using trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information for his own benefit or the benefit of a third party by convincing existing and prospective franchisees of the Plaintiff to leave and instead open ATAX franchises. Lastly, the complaint alleges that Mr. Hewitt engaged in a conspiracy to unfairly compete against and damage Liberty Tax by convincing customers and prospective customers to pick ATAX over Liberty Tax. Plaintiffs sought $20 million in actual damages, treble damages, costs, and legal fees along with injunctive relief. The Defendants have denied the allegations. The matter was settled on December 31, 2021. Under the Settlement Agreement, Defendants agreed to pay the Plaintiff $545,000 over 6 years, and to refrain from: (1) unfairly competing with Liberty Tax by tortiously interfering with its franchise agreements; (2) diverting or attempting to interfere with or divert any leases from Liberty; (3) palming off any of ATAX's products or services as those of Liberty; (4) any action or statement that could reasonably cause likelihood of confusion that any ATAX location is associated with Liberty; (5) possessing, misappropriating, using or disclosing Liberty's confidential information; and (6) accessing any of Liberty's computer systems or databases. ATAX agreed to permanently close three specific ATAX locations and use their best efforts to assign leases for those locations to Liberty. The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the final consent order.
K&A Publicidad, Inc. v. JTH Tax, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, Liberty Tax, Inc. d/b/a Siempre Tax and John Hewitt, (Case No. CL17-4169), filed on September 5, 2017 in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court. Plaintiff is a company owned and controlled by Kirke Franz Szawronski. Plaintiff alleges that it entered into a contract with Liberty to provide promotional and strategic relationship services to help grow the SiempreTax brand. Plaintiff alleged that defendants breached the contract for failure to pay for services and seeks damages. This matter, along with the Kirke Franz Szawronski matter described below, settled on January 26, 2019, with Liberty agreeing to pay plaintiff $50,000 to settle both matters, in exchange for a release.
Kirke Franz Szawronski v. JTH Tax, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, Liberty Tax, Inc., d/b/a Siempre Tax and John Hewitt, (Case No. CL17-4170), filed on September 5, 2017 in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court. Plaintiff was a former employee and filed a lawsuit claiming breach of employment agreement with Plaintiff by failing to pay 6-months' severance. Plaintiff also asserted a claim for defamation.
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Ledgers's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Item 3 discloses several legal actions involving John T. Hewitt, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Loyalty, LLC. These actions range from pending lawsuits alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty to concluded actions involving trademark disputes and breaches of contract. Specifically, JTH Tax LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service sued John T. Hewitt, Loyalty LLC, and ATAX LLC, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition, which was settled with the defendants agreeing to pay $545,000 and cease certain competitive activities. Additionally, there are governmental actions against John T. Hewitt related to compliance with franchise laws. Fortis Lux Financial, Inc. and Tutum Strategies, LLC filed a case against Loyalty Business Services, LLC a/k/a Ledgers USA, alleging fraud and breach of contract.
Item 13 outlines Ledgers's rights and responsibilities regarding its trademarks. Ledgers allows and requires franchisees to use its trademarks and service marks, and it retains the right to update or change these marks. Franchisees must use the marks in accordance with Ledgers's manual and avoid using confusingly similar marks. If a franchisee faces a claim of infringement, they must promptly notify Ledgers, which has the sole right to control any related administrative proceedings or litigation. Ledgers states that there are no pending material federal or state court litigation regarding their use or ownership rights in a trademark.
The litigation involving John T. Hewitt, particularly the lawsuit filed by Liberty Tax Service alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition, could potentially impact Ledgers's ability to protect its trademarks. While Ledgers retains control over trademark litigation and does not indemnify franchisees for related expenses, the existence of prior disputes involving similar issues could signal a vulnerability in Ledgers's trademark protection. Prospective franchisees should carefully consider the implications of these legal actions and assess the potential risk to their business if trademark disputes arise. It is important to note that Ledgers states they do not know of any superior prior rights or infringing uses that could materially affect a franchisee's use of their Marks anywhere.