What is the impact of court decisions on the Ledgers franchise agreement concerning the relationship with the franchisor?
Ledgers Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
As to franchises governed by the California Franchise Investment Law, if any of the terms of the Disclosure Document are inconsistent with the terms below, the terms below control.
California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043 provide rights to you concerning termination, transfer or non-renewal of a franchise. If the Franchise Agreement or Agreement contains provisions that are inconsistent with the law, the law will control.
The Franchise Agreement provide for termination upon bankruptcy. This provision may not be enforceable under Federal Bankruptcy Law (11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 101 et seq.).
The Franchise Agreement contain covenants not to compete which extend beyond the termination of the agreements. These provisions may not be enforceable under California law.
Section 31125 of the California Corporation Code requires the franchisor to provide you with a disclosure document before asking you to agree to a material modification of an existing franchise.
-
- Waiver of Exemplary & Punitive Damages.
RCW 19.100.190 permits franchisees to seek treble damages under certain circumstances.
Accordingly, provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere requiring franchisees to waive exemplary, punitive, or similar damages are void, except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Franchisor's Business Judgement.
Provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements stating that the franchisor may exercise its discretion on the basis of its reasonable business judgment may be limited or superseded by RCW 19.100.180(1), which requires the parties to deal with each other in good faith.
-
- Indemnification.
Any provision in the franchise agreement or related agreements requiring the franchisee to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or other parties is hereby modified such that the franchisee has no obligation to indemnify, reimburse, defend, or hold harmless the franchisor or any other indemnified party for losses or liabilities to the extent that they are caused by the indemnified party's negligence, willful misconduct, strict liability, or fraud.
-
- Noncompetition Covenants.
Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee, including an employee of a franchisee, unless the employee's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $100,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation).
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 46)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Ledgers's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement's enforceability can be affected by state and federal laws, particularly in areas like termination, non-renewal, transfer, and non-compete clauses. For franchisees in California, specific sections of the California Business and Professions Code (Sections 20000 through 20043) and the California Corporation Code (Section 31125) provide rights concerning these aspects, and these laws will take precedence if the franchise agreement contains conflicting provisions. The FDD also notes that the franchise agreement's termination clause related to bankruptcy may not be enforceable under Federal Bankruptcy Law.
For franchisees in Washington, the FDD states that provisions requiring a waiver of exemplary, punitive, or similar damages are void, except under specific negotiated settlement conditions. Additionally, the franchisor's business judgment may be limited by Washington law requiring good faith dealings between parties. Indemnification clauses are modified to protect franchisees from liability for losses caused by the franchisor's negligence or misconduct. Noncompetition covenants are unenforceable against an employee of a franchisee unless their annualized earnings exceed $100,000, adjusted annually for inflation.
These stipulations mean that certain standard clauses in the Ledgers franchise agreement may not be fully enforceable in California and Washington due to state laws designed to protect franchisees. Prospective franchisees should be aware that the laws of their specific state may provide additional rights and protections beyond what is written in the standard franchise agreement. Ledgers franchisees are encouraged to seek legal counsel to understand how these laws apply to their specific situation and to ensure full compliance with both state and federal regulations.