Can an addendum be added to the Learningrx franchise agreement to address inconsistencies with local law?
Learningrx Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WASHINGTON | Department of Financial Institutions Securities Division 150 Israel Rd S.W. Tumwater, WA 98501 360-902-8762 | Director, Dept. of Financial Institutions Securities Division 150 Israel Rd S.W. Tumwater, WA 98501 | | WISCONSIN | Wisconsin Dept. of Financial Institutions Division of Securities 345 W. Washington Avenue, 4th Floor Madison, WI 53703 608-266-8557 | Wisconsin Commissioner of Securities Same Address |
MULTI STATE ADDENDUM EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E LEARNINGRX FRANCHISE CORPORATION
MULTI STATE ADDENDUM
The following modifications are to the LearningRx Franchise Corporation Franchise Disclosure Document and may supersede, to the extent then required by valid applicable state law, certain portions of the Franchise Agreement and Area Development Agreement.
CALIFORNIA
-
- The California Franchise Investment Law requires a copy of all proposed agreements relating to the sale of the franchise be delivered together with the Disclosure Document.
-
- Neither the franchisor, nor any person or franchise broker in Item 2 of the FDD is subject to any currently effective order of any national securities association or national securities exchange, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. 78a et seq., suspending or expelling such persons from membership in such association or exchange.
-
- California Business and Professions Code sections 20000 through 20043 provide rights to the franchisee concerning termination, transfer or non-renewal of a franchise. If the franchise agreement contains a provision that is inconsistent with the law, the law will control.
-
- The franchise agreement provides for termination upon bankruptcy. This provision may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law. (11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 101 et seq.)
-
- The franchise agreement contains a covenant not to compete which extends beyond the termination of the franchise. This provision may not be enforceable under California law.
-
- The franchise agreement contains a liquidated damages clause. Under California Civil Code Section 1671, certain liquidated damages clauses are unenforceable.
-
- The franchise agreement requires binding arbitration. The arbitration will occur in Colorado with the costs being borne by both parties.
-
- Prospective franchisees are encouraged to consult private legal counsel to determine the applicability of California and federal laws (such as Business and Professions Code Section 20040.5, Code Procedure Section 1281, and the Federal Arbitration Act) to any provisions of a franchise agreement restricting venue to a forum outside the State of California.
-
- The franchise agreement requires application of the laws of Colorado. This provision may not be enforceable under California law.
-
- Section 31125 of the California Corporations Code requires us to give you a disclosure document, in a form containing the information that the commissioner may by rule or order require, before a solicitation of a proposed material modification of an existing franchise.
-
- You must sign a general release if you renew or transfer your franchise. California Corporations Code §31512 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Investment Law (California Corporations Code §§31000 through 31516). Business and Professions Code §20010 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code §§20000 through 20043).
-
- The earnings claims figures do not reflect all the costs of sales, operating expenses, or other costs or expenses that must be deducted from the gross revenue or gross sales figures to obtain your net income or profit. You should conduct an independent investigation of the costs
and expenses you will incur in operating your franchise business. Franchisees or former franchisees, listed in the franchise disclosure document, may be one source of this information.
-
- The highest interest rate permitted by law in California is ten percent (10%).
-
- California's Franchise Investment Law (Corporations Code sections 31512 and 31512.1) states that any provision of a franchise agreement or related document requiring the franchisee to waive specific provisions of the law is contrary to public policy and is void and unenforceable. The law also prohibits a franchisor from disclaiming or denying (i) representations it, its employees, or its agents make to you, (ii) your ability to rely on any representations it makes to you, or (iii) any violations of the law.
-
- No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
-
- OUR WEBSITE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION. ANY COMPLAINTS CONCERNING THE CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DIRECTED TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION at www.dfpi.ca.gov.
-
- Registration of this franchise does not constitute approval, recommendation, or endorsement by the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned hereby acknowledges having read this Addendum, and understands and consents to be bound by all of its terms.
| LEARNINGRX FRANCHISE CORP: | Franchisee: |
|---|---|
| By: | By: |
| Title: | Title: |
HAWAII
The following is added to the Cover Page:
THIS FRANCHISE WILL BE/HAS BEEN FILED UNDER THE FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW OF THE STATE OF HAWAII. FILING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL, RECOMMENDATION OR ENDORSEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS OR A FINDING BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING.
THE FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW MAKES IT UNLAWFUL TO OFFER OR SELL ANY FRANCHISE IN THIS STATE WITHOUT FIRST PROVIDING TO YOU OR SUBFRANCHISOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION BY YOU OR SUBFRANCHISOR OF ANY BINDING FRANCHISE OR OTHER AGREEMENT, OR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PAYMENT OF ANY CONSIDERATION BY YOU, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST, A COPY OF THE FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH A COPY OF ALL PROPOSED AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF THE FRANCHISE.
THIS FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS A SUMMARY ONLY OF CERTAIN MATERIAL PROVISIONS OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT SHOULD BE REFERRED TO FOR A STATEMENT OF ALL RIGHTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF BOTH US AND YOU.
Registered agent in the state authorized to receive service of process:
Commissioner of Securities of the State of Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Business Registration Division 335 Merchant Street, Room 203 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
The following list reflects the status of the Franchise registrations of the Franchisor in the states which require registration:
-
- This proposed registration is effective in the following states: California, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Virginia and Wisconsin
-
- This proposed registration is or will shortly be on file in the following states: Hawaii, Michigan, New York and Washington
-
- States which have refused, by order or otherwise, to register these Franchises are: None
-
- States which have revoked or suspended the right to offer the Franchises are: None
-
- States in which the proposed registration of these Franchises has been withdrawn are: None
No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
ILLINOIS ADDENDUM TO THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, FRANCHISE AGREEMENT and AREA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Item 17(v) of the Franchise Disclosure Document, Section 16.02 of the Franchise Agreement and Section 11.06 of the Area Development Agreement are amended to state that any provision that designates jurisdiction or venue in a forum outside the State of Illinois will not be enforceable and is amended to the extent required by Illinois law.
Item 17(v)(w) of the Franchise Disclosure Document, Section 16.02 of the Franchise Agreement and Section 11.06 Area Development Agreement are amended to state that "The governing law or choice of law clause that allows for jurisdiction or venue other than Illinois will not be enforceable under Illinois law and that Illinois law shall govern the Agreements. This governing law clause shall not be construed to negate the application of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act in all situations to which it is applicable.
Section 705(41) of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act states any condition, stipulation, or provision purporting to bind any person acquiring any franchise to waive compliance with any provision of this Act or any other law of this State is void.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 54–209)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Learningrx Franchise Disclosure Document, addenda are used to address inconsistencies between the standard franchise agreement and state laws. The FDD includes a Multi-State Addendum (Exhibit E) that modifies the standard agreement to comply with specific state laws. Furthermore, Learningrx includes state-specific addenda for California, Virginia, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, addressing various legal requirements and potential conflicts.
For example, the California addendum notes that if any provision in the franchise agreement is inconsistent with California law, the law will take precedence. Similarly, the Virginia addendum acknowledges restrictions in the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, amending the Franchise Disclosure Document accordingly. The Rhode Island addendum states that any provision restricting jurisdiction or venue to a forum outside of Rhode Island is void with respect to claims enforceable under the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act.
These addenda ensure that Learningrx franchisees are not bound by terms in the franchise agreement that violate local laws. The FDD also includes an acknowledgment stating that the applicable state law addendum supersedes any inconsistent portion of the Franchise Agreement or Franchise Disclosure Document, but only to the extent they are valid requirements of an applicable and enforceable state law, and for only so long as such state law remains in effect. This indicates that Learningrx is willing to modify its standard agreement to comply with state-specific legal requirements, providing some assurance to prospective franchisees that the agreement will be adapted to their local jurisdiction.