factual

What California laws might amend the Gokhale Method franchise documents?

Gokhale_Method Franchise · 2024 FDD

Answer from 2024 FDD Document

MENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION.

    1. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation requires that certain provisions contained in franchise documents be amended to be consistent with California law, including the California Franchise Investment Law, CAL. CORP. CODE Section 3100 et seq., and the California Franchise Relations Act, CAL. BUS. PROF. CODE Section 20000 et seq. To the extent that the disclosure document and/or Franchise Agreement contain provisions that are inconsistent with the following, such provisions are hereby amended:
    • A. Item 17 of the disclosure document is supplemented by the following language:
      • a. California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043 provide rights to the franchisee concerning termination, transfer, or non-renewal of a franchise. If the franchise agreement contains a provision that is inconsistent with the law, the law will control.
      • b. The Franchise Agreement provides for termination upon bankruptcy. This provision may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 101 et seq.).
      • c. The Franchise Agreement contains a covenant not to compete which extends beyond the termination of the franchise. This provision may not be enforceable under California law.
      • d. The Franchise Agreement contains a liquidated damages clause. Under California Civil Code Section 1671, certain liquidated damages clauses are unenforceable.
      • e. The Franchise Agreement requires the parties to try to settle disputes in mediation administered by the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") under its Commercial Mediation Procedures. If not resolved by mediation, the Franchise Agreement requires binding arbitration. The arbitration will occur at Palo Alto, California with the costs being borne by the parties equally. Prospective franchisees are encouraged to consult private legal counsel to determine the applicability of California and federal laws (such as Business and Professions Code Section 20040.5, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281, and the Federal Arbitration Act) to any provisions of a franchise agreement restricting venue to a forum outside the State of California.
      • f. The franchise agreement requires application of the laws of California except that the laws of the state in which Franchisee is located governs any covenants not to compete.
    1. Our website is www.gokhalemethod.com. OUR WEBSITE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION. ANY COMPLAINTS CONCERNING THE CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DIRECTED TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION AT www.dfi.ca.gov.
    1. THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW REQUIRES THAT A COPY OF ALL PROPOSED AGREEMENTS RELATED TO THE SALE OF THE FRANCHISE BE DELIVERED TOGETHER WITH A COPY OF THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
    1. You may have to sign a general release if you renew or extend your franchise. California Corporations Code Section 31512 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Investment Law (California Corporations Code Sections 31000 through 31516). Business and Professions Code Section 20010 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043).

Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 34)

What This Means (2024 FDD)

According to Gokhale Method's 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation mandates that certain provisions within the franchise documents be consistent with California law. These laws include the California Franchise Investment Law, CAL. CORP. CODE Section 3100 et seq., and the California Franchise Relations Act, CAL. BUS. PROF. CODE Section 20000 et seq.

Specifically, California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043 grant franchisees rights regarding termination, transfer, or non-renewal of a franchise. The FDD states that if any provision in the Franchise Agreement is inconsistent with these laws, the law will take precedence. Additionally, the Franchise Agreement's provision for termination upon bankruptcy may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law.

Furthermore, any covenant not to compete extending beyond the franchise term may not be enforceable under California law. The FDD also notes that under California Civil Code Section 1671, certain liquidated damages clauses are unenforceable. Prospective Gokhale Method franchisees are encouraged to seek legal counsel to understand how California and federal laws, such as Business and Professions Code Section 20040.5, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281, and the Federal Arbitration Act, apply to provisions restricting venue to outside California.

Finally, California Corporations Code Section 31512 voids any waiver of rights under the Franchise Investment Law (California Corporations Code Sections 31000 through 31516), and Business and Professions Code Section 20010 voids waivers of rights under the Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043).

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.