In Washington, what is the minimum annualized earnings an employee of a Fat Shack franchisee must have for a noncompetition covenant to be enforceable?
Fat_Shack Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- Noncompetition Covenants. Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee, including an employee of a franchisee, unless the employee's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $100,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). In addition, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an independent contractor of a franchisee under RCW 49.62.030 unless the independent contractor's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $250,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). As a result, any provision contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere that conflicts with these limitations is v
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 53–223)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Fat Shack's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, in Washington, a noncompetition covenant is only enforceable against an employee of a Fat Shack franchisee if the employee's annualized earnings exceed $100,000. This figure will be adjusted annually for inflation. This is based on Washington state law RCW 49.62.020.
For a Fat Shack franchisee in Washington, this means that any non-compete agreements they require their employees to sign are only valid if the employee earns above this threshold. If an employee earns less than $100,000 annualized (adjusted for inflation), the non-compete agreement is void and unenforceable.
This also applies to independent contractors. A noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an independent contractor of a franchisee unless the independent contractor's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $250,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation).