For Fat Shack, what states or provinces have specific Riders to the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement?
Fat_Shack Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
RIDERS TO THE NONDISCLOSURE AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC STATES AND PROVINCES
If any one of the following Riders to the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement for Specific States and Provinces ("Riders") is checked as an "Applicable Rider" below, then that Rider shall be incorporated into the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement entered into by Fat Shack, Inc. and the undersigned Associate and Company. To the extent any terms of an Applicable Rider conflict with the terms of the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement, the terms of the Applicable Rider shall supersede the terms of the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement.
APPLICABLE RIDER UNITED STATES WASHINGTON CANADA CANADA (ALL PROVINCES) FSI: COMPANY: FAT SHACK INC., a Delaware corporation a By: By: Its: Its: ASSOCIATE: Print Name:
UNITED STATES RIDERS
WASHINGTON RIDER TO THE NONDISCLOSURE AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 53–223)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Fat Shack's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement may have specific riders for certain states and provinces. Currently, the document specifies that there is a rider for Washington state and also for all provinces in Canada.
These riders are incorporated into the standard Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement if they are marked as "Applicable Rider." If there is a conflict between the terms of the standard agreement and the rider, the terms of the rider will take precedence.
Prospective franchisees should carefully review these riders, if applicable to their location, to understand any specific modifications to the standard Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement. This ensures they are fully aware of their obligations and rights under the agreement as it pertains to their specific state or province.