What happens if a provision in the Fat Shack franchise agreement unreasonably restricts the statute of limitations for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act?
Fat_Shack Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 53–223)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Fat Shack's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, any provisions in the franchise agreement or related documents that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act may not be enforceable. This also applies to rights or remedies under the Act, such as the right to a jury trial.
For a prospective Fat Shack franchisee in Washington, this means that if the franchise agreement attempts to shorten the time you have to file a claim under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or limits your right to a jury trial, those specific provisions might be deemed unenforceable by a court. This protection is designed to ensure that franchisees have adequate time and means to pursue legal claims related to violations of the Act.
This clause aims to protect franchisees from unfair limitations imposed by the franchise agreement, ensuring they retain their rights under Washington law. It is important for franchisees to be aware of this protection and to consult with legal counsel if they believe their rights are being restricted by the franchise agreement.