Under what circumstances, as detailed in Section 8.3, is an Exit franchisee NOT solely responsible for fines, suits, proceedings, claims, or damages relating to its business?
Exit Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
If Franchisee is named as a defendant or party in any action involving the Proprietary Marks or System and if Franchisee is named as a defendant or party solely because the plaintiff or claimant is alleg
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 42–235)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Exit's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Section 8.3 outlines specific circumstances where an Exit franchisee is not solely responsible for legal and financial liabilities related to actions involving the Proprietary Marks or System. If a franchisee is named as a defendant or party in any action involving the Proprietary Marks or System, and this occurs solely because the plaintiff or claimant is alleging something, the franchisee is not solely responsible.
This means that if the franchisee is involved in a lawsuit or claim simply due to their association with Exit's trademarks or System, and not due to any direct action or negligence on their part, Exit may assume some responsibility. This provision protects franchisees from bearing the entire burden of legal actions that arise from the franchisor's brand or operational methods.
It is important for prospective Exit franchisees to understand the scope and limitations of this protection. While Exit offers some support in these specific cases, franchisees should still maintain adequate insurance coverage and operate their businesses responsibly to minimize the risk of legal claims. Franchisees should consult with a legal professional to fully understand their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement.