In the case of Robert Price and Linda Price v. Epcon Communities, what claims did the plaintiffs assert?
Epcon_Communities Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
IGATION**
Concluded Actions
Robert Price and Linda Price v. Epcon Communities, LLC, Epcon Marrington, LLC, Epcon Communities North Carolinas, LLC, and Jenkins Plumbing Company, LLC, Case No. 2022-CP-0801974 in the Court of Common Pleas for the Ninth Judicial District, Berkeley County, South Carolina. Litigation commenced August 18, 2022. The plaintiffs alleged defects and deficiencies relating to the construction of
plumbing work in a residential unit in the community known as Marrington Villas at Cobblestone located in Berkeley County, South Carolina. The plaintiffs asserted claims of negligence/gross negligence, breach of implied warranties, and violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. The defendants agreed to pay plaintiffs $95,000, of which $35,000 was paid by the Epcon entities, and the remainder by subcontractors of the Epcon e
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 13–15)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Epcon Communities' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Robert Price and Linda Price filed a lawsuit against Epcon Communities, LLC, Epcon Marrington, LLC, Epcon Communities North Carolinas, LLC, and Jenkins Plumbing Company, LLC. The litigation, which commenced on August 18, 2022, took place in the Court of Common Pleas for the Ninth Judicial District, Berkeley County, South Carolina.
The plaintiffs in this case alleged defects and deficiencies related to the construction and plumbing work in a residential unit within the Marrington Villas at Cobblestone community in Berkeley County, South Carolina. Specifically, the plaintiffs asserted claims of negligence/gross negligence, breach of implied warranties, and violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The case was concluded with the defendants agreeing to pay the plaintiffs $95,000. Of this amount, $35,000 was paid by the Epcon entities, while the remaining balance was covered by subcontractors of the Epcon entities. This resolution indicates that Epcon Communities faced legal action due to construction-related issues and potential breaches of consumer protection laws, which could be a point of consideration for prospective franchisees.