Is interfering with Engel & Volkers' relationships with its franchisees considered a default?
Engel_Volkers Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- 20.3.25 interferes or attempts to interfere in any manner with Franchisor's or ENGEL & VÖLKERS' contractual relations and/or Franchisor's or ENGEL & VÖLKERS' relationships with other ENGEL & VÖLKERS System franchisees, any supplier of Franchisee, Franchisor, ENGEL & VÖLKERS or other franchisees, any governmental or quasi-governmental authority, Franchisor's or ENGEL & VÖLKERS' customers/clients, employees or advertising agencies, or any third parties;
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 88)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Engel & Volkers' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, interfering with Engel & Volkers' relationships with its franchisees is considered a default of the franchise agreement. Specifically, if a franchisee interferes or attempts to interfere with Engel & Volkers' relationships with other Engel & Volkers System franchisees, it constitutes a breach of contract.
This provision protects Engel & Volkers' network and ensures franchisees maintain positive relationships. This clause aims to prevent any actions by a franchisee that could harm the overall brand or the relationships between franchisees, suppliers, or other related parties.
If a franchisee violates this provision, Engel & Volkers can issue a notice to cure the default, allowing the franchisee a period to rectify the situation. Failure to cure the default within the specified time frame can lead to termination of the franchise agreement.