In the lawsuit filed by Will Farris, what did the complaint against Dryer Vent Squad allege?
Dryer_Vent_Squad Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
Will Farris v. Dryer Vent Squad Franchising LLC, Leiby Goldberger and Curt Swanson, Case No. 22-1311-I, filed in the Chancery Court for Davidson County, Tennessee at Nashville on October 2, 2022. The plaintiff, Will Farris, a former franchisee of Dryer Vent Squad, filed a suit against Dryer Vent Squad and our CEO and COO, Leiby "Leo" Goldberger and Curt Swanson, respectively, alleging that the defendants concealed material information that they had a duty to disclose to the plaintiff and in the Dryer Vent Squad Franchise Disclosure Documents. Plaintiff brought a three-count complaint alleging fraudulent inducement, fraudulent inducement by concealment, and injunctive relief. On January 11, 2023, Defendants filed an answer denying the claims**. Plaintiff Will Farris and Defendants amicably resolved their dispute (with no money exchanging hands) and, on March 31, 2023, the Court entered an order reflecting the dismissal with prejudice of their respective claims.**
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 11–15)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to the 2024 Dryer Vent Squad Franchise Disclosure Document, Will Farris, a former Dryer Vent Squad franchisee, filed a lawsuit against Dryer Vent Squad, CEO Leiby "Leo" Goldberger, and COO Curt Swanson on October 2, 2022. The complaint alleged that the defendants concealed material information that they had a duty to disclose to the plaintiff and in the Dryer Vent Squad Franchise Disclosure Documents.
The lawsuit included three counts: fraudulent inducement, fraudulent inducement by concealment, and a request for injunctive relief. On January 11, 2023, the defendants responded by filing an answer denying the claims.
The dispute between Will Farris and Dryer Vent Squad was amicably resolved, with no money exchanging hands. On March 31, 2023, the Court entered an order reflecting the dismissal with prejudice of their respective claims, meaning the claims cannot be brought again.