For Dryer Vent Squad, what constitutes 'routine litigation incidental to the business' that would be exempt from disclosure requirements regarding pending actions?
Dryer_Vent_Squad Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
Amendments to the Dryer Vent Squad Franchise Disclosure Document
-
- Item 3 "Litigation," is supplemented by the addition of the following:
- A. Neither the Franchisor nor any person identified in Items 1 or 2 above has any administrative, criminal or material civil action (or a significant number of civil actions irrespective of materiality) pending against him alleging a violation of any franchise law, fraud, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, restraint of trade, unfair or deceptive practices, business opportunity law, securities law, misappropriation of property or comparable allegations.
- B. Neither the Franchisor nor any other person identified in Items 1 or 2 above has during the 10 year period immediately preceding the date of this Disclosure Document, been convicted of a felony or pleaded nolo contendere to a felony charge or been held liable in any civil action by final judgment, or been the subject of any material complaint or other legal proceeding where a felony, civil action, complaint or other legal proceeding involved violation of any franchise law, fraud, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, restraint of trade, unfair or deceptive practices, business opportunity law, securities law, misappropriation of property or comparable allegations or which was brought by a present or former purchaser-investor or which involves or involved the business opportunity relationship.
- C. Neither the Franchisor nor any person identified in Items 1 or 2 above is subject to any currently effective injunctive or restrictive order or decree relating to the franchise, or under any federal, state or Canadian franchise, securities, business opportunity, antitrust, trade regulation or trade practice law as a result of concluded or pending action or proceeding brought by a public agency, or is a party to a proceeding currently pending in which an order is sought, relating to or affecting business opportunity activities or the seller-purchaser-investor relationship, or involving fraud, including but not limited to, a violation of any business opportunity law, franchise law, securities law or unfair or deceptive practices law, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, misappropriation of property or restraint of trade.
- D. Neither Company nor any person identified in Item 2 above is subject to any currently effective order of any national securities association or national securities exchange (as defined in the Securities & Exchange Act of 1934) suspending or expelling these persons from membership in the association or exchange.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 51–207)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
I am unable to provide information about what constitutes 'routine litigation incidental to the business' for Dryer Vent Squad, according to the 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document excerpts provided. The excerpts do not define what Dryer Vent Squad considers to be 'routine litigation incidental to the business' that would be exempt from disclosure requirements regarding pending actions. The excerpts do include amendments to Item 3 "Litigation," for Connecticut, but these amendments do not define 'routine litigation incidental to the business'.
Without a clear definition in the FDD, prospective franchisees face uncertainty regarding what types of legal issues the franchisor deems minor enough to not disclose. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the full scope of potential legal risks associated with the franchise.
To gain clarity, it is crucial for potential franchisees to directly ask Dryer Vent Squad's franchisor for a comprehensive definition of 'routine litigation incidental to the business'. Requesting examples of past litigation that fell under this category can also provide valuable insight. Additionally, consulting with a franchise attorney can help in understanding the legal implications of this ambiguous term and its potential impact on the franchise agreement.